×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

ASCE 7-10 Snow Load Drift Height

ASCE 7-10 Snow Load Drift Height

ASCE 7-10 Snow Load Drift Height

(OP)
When calculating the drift height and width per Section 7.7.1 I'm confused by this statement:
"If this height exceeds hc, the drift width, w, shall equal 4hd2/hc and the drift height shall equal hc."

So, what value of hd is used in the equation for w? The value calculated in Figure 7.9 OR the value of hc, making w=4hc2/hc.

RE: ASCE 7-10 Snow Load Drift Height

I use the calculated value of hd in the equation. This increases the width of the drift, but if my calculations are correct it preserves the total volume of the drift. If it were otherwise I have to believe they would have stated that w = 4*hc.

RE: ASCE 7-10 Snow Load Drift Height

it is the hd calculated previously. Its basically trying to get the volume of drifted snow to remain the same. the volume of snow in the normal case (hc>hd) give you 4*hd^2/2. when the snow drift is truncated you get hc*(4*hd^2/hc)/2 which reduces to the same 4*hd^2/2.

RE: ASCE 7-10 Snow Load Drift Height

Here in Wisconsin, i still use ASCE 7-05.

Are you all saying that the "hd" in 7-10 is calculated by formula rather than derived from a Figure 7-9 as in 7-05?

I DO need to purchase ASCE 7-10 since Wisconsin is destined to adopt it.

RE: ASCE 7-10 Snow Load Drift Height

I agree with the responses by RobertHale and structSU10; use the calculated value of hd.

BSVBD; no, both ASCE 7-05 and ASCE 7-10 use Figure 7-9 to determine hd. There is an equation for hd included within Figure 7-9 but that is true for both ASCE 7-05 and ASCE 7-10 and the equation is identical in both standards.

RE: ASCE 7-10 Snow Load Drift Height

(OP)
Thanks everybody. It makes sense to use the previously calculated hd value to preserve the total snow drift volume. It's worded very awkwardly to me.

RE: ASCE 7-10 Snow Load Drift Height

(OP)
I've got another question to tag onto this thread. In section 7.8 it states that for parapets lu is the length of the roof upwind of the wall so obviously hd is calculated assuming a windward drift. However for projections it specifies that lu be taken as the larger of the roof lengths on either side. For a roof projection I'm not sure if hd is calculated using the windward or leeward equations. Does anybody know the answer to this?

RE: ASCE 7-10 Snow Load Drift Height

To provide an absolute answer, one would need to define a "projection".

In 7.8, ASCE inadvertently defines an applicable projection as something greater than 15' wide.

But, how TALL is the projection? And is the projection a parapet wall?

If either the projection or parapet is too tall, we would then not consider the leeward drift.

I would say, in most cases, a projection would cause a windward drift.

Within project specific reason and judgment, unless one "greatly" outweighs the other, why not take the conservatively larger of the two?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources