×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Wrought Iron Material Properties
2

Wrought Iron Material Properties

Wrought Iron Material Properties

(OP)
Hi Everyone,

Does anyone know where I can find the yield and ultimate strength of wrought iron. I am doing some rehab work to a wrought iron Phoenix Truss, built in 1889. I have looked in several places, including AISC's Iron and Steel Beams 1873 to 1952, and all I can find is the allowable stress. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks!

RE: Wrought Iron Material Properties

Cast iron really had no clearly defined yield point. Link

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Wrought Iron Material Properties

Have you tried SlideRuleEra's site? He has a Phoenix Handbook from 1888, which contains information on wrought iron design.

http://www.slideruleera.net/structural-steel-handb...

Do you have a photo of the truss that you can post? I saw one around Danbury CT about 25 years ago. There was also a bridge here in NYC crossing the Harlem River that used Phoenix columns on the approach spans. Alas, it was demolished and replaced a few years ago.

RE: Wrought Iron Material Properties

(OP)
Thanks for the article KootK. I am pretty much finding the same thing. Even the AASHTO Manual for Condition Evaluation of Bridges gives only the allowable stress for tension and bending of wrought iron.

For this rehab, I am using high strength bolts at some of the connections and I want to check the bolt bearing on the existing wrought iron members. I was just going to use the allowable stress given for wrought iron, but doing so gives me an unreasonable amount of bolts. I'm just wondering now, if I would be able to back into something reasonable?

RE: Wrought Iron Material Properties

I can see your dilemma. I imagine that bolt bearing strength would more closely resemble the 80 ksi. But, then, it's scary to make assumptions in a brittle material governed by fracture mechanics. I found this for rivets: Link. It's encouraging with respect to potential capacity but it would be nice if we could dig up something more official and, perhaps, local. And bolt specific.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Wrought Iron Material Properties

(OP)
Thanks for the Link Bridgebuster! I didn't think to look at SlideRule's site. This actually helps me out a lot. This one in Pennsylvania and is approximately 131' long c/c brgs.

Here is a few pictures:







RE: Wrought Iron Material Properties

Pitt- nice photos; thanks. I assume from your handle you're on the western side of the state. I'm in the Poconos. This weekend I'll scan the photos I took years ago.

RE: Wrought Iron Material Properties

Look online at the New York City Building Code 1901 edition. It has ultimate tensile strength values for wrought iron and steel that apply to buildings of that era.

RE: Wrought Iron Material Properties

(OP)

@ KootK:

Quote (KootK)

it's scary to make assumptions in a brittle material governed by fracture mechanics
I could not agree more, especially when coupling that with a non-redundant structure.

Quote (KootK)

I imagine that bolt bearing strength would more closely resemble the 80 ksi.
How did you arrive at this value? The reason ask, is because I was thinking more like in the 20 ksi range. Unless you mean the shear strength of the bolt itself?

Quote (KootK)

It's encouraging with respect to potential capacity but it would be nice if we could dig up something more official and, perhaps, local. And bolt specific.

I actually did find some equations for rivet bearing on wrought iron in the Phoenix Handbook from SlideRule's site, which I am going to use. Whether its a bolt or rivet, should not matter. The equations call for 12 to 15 ksi for allowable bearing. They are a bit lower than what I had hoped, but at least I now have some valid/official equations and allowables I can lean on.

@ Bridgebuster: I am from the Harrisburg Area, I went to Pitt for school. This bridge is actually the only access point for a development on the one side of the creek (there is one other access point at the other end of the development) and the creek wraps around about 3/4 of the community. So it kind of creates a private little peninsula for them...its pretty neat.

Thanks for your help guys!

RE: Wrought Iron Material Properties

Quote (PittEng88)

Whether its a bolt or rivet, should not matter.
Make sure you double check that assumption. I do remember from my undergrad steel course that forming the head of the rivet expands the shank to completely fill the rivet hole. I know that the stress distribution from the bolt will be different from the rivet; I just don't know if that will be trivial.

RE: Wrought Iron Material Properties

Here's some historical info from J.A.L. Waddell from his book Bridge Engineering (Volume 1, 1916). I came across it while I was looking for information on how our ancestors designed reinforced concrete bridge piers.

RE: Wrought Iron Material Properties

(OP)
@RobertHale: I understand what you are saying and I appreciate the heads ups. It makes sense when you think about it, a rivet would have a little bit better stress distribution into the member as opposed to a bolt placed loosely in the hole. However, according to my steel book, the analysis of rivets verses bolts is essentially the same, only the material properties would be different. For both rivets and bolts, the bearing stress is computed as an average over the contact area with the contact area being the fastener diameter times the thickness of the member. So I would assume that this variation in stress distribution can be considered trivial.

@boo1: Thanks for the articles, they were all very interesting reads.

@Bridgebuster: The allowables in this blurb actually match up very nicely with what I was seeing in the Phoenix Handbook, but it gives a better description as to how one would arrive at this numbers. So, thank you.



Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources