×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Applicable Code

Applicable Code

Applicable Code

(OP)
Per Metengr's suggestion, I'm crossposting this from the welding forum: (original thread: here

I was viewing a job with one of our estimators. We are installing large metal hanging brackets to a block wall. In the middle of the wall span is a large column that supports the roof, a 2nd floor deck, and on the side we're working on there's also a large stool welded to support that section of an overhead crane rail for a 20 ton overhead.

Our employees asked me in front of the estimator if they can weld the hanger to the column. From a capacity standpoint I'm not entirely worried since rough math in my head works out, but from a liability standpoint I told the estimator I wasn't positive but I thought pretty strongly that a structural engineer would need to sign off on that since it's welding to a large structural entity that is supporting a lot of load already. Our company doesn't have a formal policy that addresses it but we've always operated under the mindset of being extra cautious and never put our neck out for more liability than we need to...

Long story short, he overstepped his bounds and said he's an engineer and he'll sign off on it (even though he's not a structural engineer, he's a HVAC design engineer). I was pretty pissed that he didn't even give me time to look into it and just did it. I had a talk with my manager (the VP) and he felt the same way in that a P.E. should have reviewed it.

So the question I have is, does anybody know if there's a specific code (OSHA, UBC, or some other federal or state [Wisconsin]) that specifically states that it should have been signed off because it's being welded onto a structural support/crane support? Or am I making presumptions that I shouldn't be...

I know that welding to structural is done left and right, and the crane is my concern as well, *but* the question isn't whether a PE should sign off or not, it's which standard/code/regulation says they should. My VP and I are both tradesmen so we look at this as a no-brainer, but the president is a business major and doesn't always look at things the same practical way we do. If it comes down to a pissing match between me and the estimator I want to be able to say to the boss 'Here, this is the standard that says he needs to have a PE review it because it's a crane/structural support/whatever.' so the discussion isn't my opinion versus this estimator's but instead is a 'this is what code says'.

RE: Applicable Code

It goes without saying that a column (or any member) in a structure cannot be modified in a way which could jeopardize its structural integrity without a proper investigation by someone knowledgeable in structural analysis. In this case, the code which was violated was the professional code of ethics in that particular jurisdiction.

BA

RE: Applicable Code

I agree with BAretired. The estimator/HVAC design engineer is giving advice outside the field of his expertise, which is unethical if he is a PE in his field. If not a PE, his advice is possibly illegally given, depending on whether there is an industrial exemption at your location.

RE: Applicable Code

The code provision that probably governs your situation is the IBC-2012, Paragraph 3404.3. There it states that any gravity load member whose load changes by 5% or more must be designed to meet the current requirements of the code. That makes the design fall back on the qualified individual that BAretired and hokie66 described above. And not on some HVAC engineer with no structural design expertise.
Dave

Thaidavid

RE: Applicable Code

Agree with BAretired and hokie66. In addition, if you are using the International Building Code (which I believe is used in Wisconsin) this would be considered a Level II alteration under the Existing Building Code, requiring structural analysis.

RE: Applicable Code

I also agree with the above.

One further suggestion... Suggest to your boss tell the ME to get building department approval for the structural modification, on his own time, or he is going to be fired.machinegun

Mike McCann, PE, SE (WA)


Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources