×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

reduced ID fittings

reduced ID fittings

reduced ID fittings

(OP)
We ordered standard B16.9 fittings but some of them came with a reduced ID. For example, an 8" - Schedule 160 tee. The nominal ID that we expected would be 6.813". What was supplied was a tee with an ID of 4.96". We did not find this out intil system flow testing. We were not getting the flow that our hydraulic modeling predicted. The tee was UTed and subsequently cut out. My question is what should we have specified in order to get a tee with the expected ID?
thanks
Mark

RE: reduced ID fittings

A 'full bore' fitting?
Honestly, I don't know if there's an industry standard in any industry for specifying what you want, except maybe to add language to the PO that a ball of a given size has to fall through the lumen.

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: reduced ID fittings

That's certainly a large bore reduction.

Surprisingly B 16.9 6.2.2 says "6.2.2 Bore Diameter. Bore diameters away from the ends are not specified. If special flow path requirements are needed, the bore dimensions shall be specified by the purchaser."

So do exactly that - " 8" schedule 160 tee with minimum main bore of 6.8" diameter "

Remember - More details = better answers
Also: If you get a response it's polite to respond to it.

RE: reduced ID fittings

I'm not clear on how a fitting with such a heavier wall got welded into the system and flow tested without anyone noticing and questioning such a difference in wall thickness.

RE: reduced ID fittings

(OP)
Gator, the ends of the fitting were properly counter-bored from the vendor in order to meet the Code required mismatch criteria.

RE: reduced ID fittings

We frequently see tees, caps and similar BW parts which are made to at least one schedule heavier than required, then back-tapered at the BW ends to match the ID of the required pipe schedule. We suspect they're actually fittings for a heavier schedule which were under-tolerance on wall thickness.

RE: reduced ID fittings

Unfortunately there is nothing preventing a fitting manufacturer from making lighter wall fittings from heavier wall fittings, as long as the BW ends meet the wall thickness requirements of what the fittings are qualified to and stamped.

RE: reduced ID fittings

I've seen this quite a lot as it's typical for many fittings to be forged from much thicker material in order to maintain the minimum required wall thickness. DVWE is quite correct in his statements and this is a very typical industry practice, though typically haven'd seen that much of an ID reduction.

What you would want to spec the supplier is typically called a "through bore" fitting which you would then get you what you should expect. In addition I'd probably ask for fabrication drawings to approve as in some cases the outer dimensions are changed to meet this criteria.

RE: reduced ID fittings

I remember having a flow problem in the seawater system of a nice yacht being built on the opposite coast.

ISTR that most of the system was nominally 3" PVC, but somewhere in the middle of it the builder had installed a fitting called a "king nipple" that was found to have a bore under 1.5" diameter. That limited the flow, and in turn the exhaust system cooling, which is how it became my problem. It took a week of phone calls back and forth, and actual attempts to roll a ball through the system a section at a time to discover the root cause.

I never did get a ride on the yacht, but we got the system working okay with a bigger nipple, so it was a happy ending.



Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources