×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Flexural Post-Tensioned Beam Capacity while under Tension

Flexural Post-Tensioned Beam Capacity while under Tension

Flexural Post-Tensioned Beam Capacity while under Tension

(OP)
I am looking for suggestions on the best way to determine the remaining flexural capacity of a post-tensioned beam under various tension loads. Would you just assign certain strands to resisting the tension load and others to resisting the flexural bending? Maybe reduce the Aps*fps component by the amount needed to resist the tension when calculating Mn? Just curious how others are going about this. I can't seem to find any information on post-tensioned beams simultaneously in flexure and tension. Thanks in advance.

RE: Flexural Post-Tensioned Beam Capacity while under Tension

Quote (azogr)

Would you just assign certain strands to resisting the tension load and others to resisting the flexural bending? Maybe reduce the Aps*fps component by the amount needed to resist the tension when calculating Mn?

While I don't think that either of these methods is 100% correct, I suspect that they would generally be conservative and sufficiently accurate for typical cases where the tension force would be small relative to the precompression.

Without knowing the particulars of your case, I'd recommend something like the method illustrated below where a greater degree of accuracy is required. And, of course, you might as well nail it if it's something that you'll be automating anyhow.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Flexural Post-Tensioned Beam Capacity while under Tension

azogr

As the strands are at a varying d from the surface and the tension force would normally be applied at the plastic centroid in tension or at the neutral axis, it is not logical to simply remove strands to allow for it.

A strain compatibility analysis as Kootk has shown would be the best solution, but the prestress stress will not necessarily be fpy as he has shown. It will depend on the strain at the depth of the prestress if bonded or whatever unbonded stress relationship you are using for unbonded.

RE: Flexural Post-Tensioned Beam Capacity while under Tension

Agreed regarding fps vs fpy

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Flexural Post-Tensioned Beam Capacity while under Tension

(OP)
Gents, thank you for taking the time to respond. This makes sense and should work well for automating my existing spreadsheet. The members I am working with will typically be resisting an equal share of tension and flexure. They will have unbonded straight tendons placed symmetrically both above and below the neutral axis. KootK, are you utilizing an unfactored tension load when using this approach?

RE: Flexural Post-Tensioned Beam Capacity while under Tension

I was thinking to factor the tension load.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Flexural Post-Tensioned Beam Capacity while under Tension

(OP)
oops, fat fingered something.

RE: Flexural Post-Tensioned Beam Capacity while under Tension

The procedure is the same for axial tension, zero axial load, or axial compression.

With the compression face at the specified ultimate axial strain, find the NA depth where the resultant axial force is equal to the applied axial force, then take moments about the centroid (or any other reference axis).

Doug Jenkins
Interactive Design Services
http://newtonexcelbach.wordpress.com/

RE: Flexural Post-Tensioned Beam Capacity while under Tension

(OP)
So the tension load should be considered when calculating the area of the compression stress block as well? For instance the equilibrium equation would be modified to 0.85f'c*b*a = Aps*fps + As*fy - As'*fy' - Tu when under a tension load (Tu).

RE: Flexural Post-Tensioned Beam Capacity while under Tension

Yep.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources