×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Why apply seperated head front closures in hair pain type heat exchangers

Why apply seperated head front closures in hair pain type heat exchangers

Why apply seperated head front closures in hair pain type heat exchangers

(OP)
Hello everyone, I am new to this site so please forgive me any beginner stupidities.

For a current running project we have to design a hair pin heat exchanger which operates in hydrogen service.
The design shall be according the ISO 12212/ API 663.
According to this standard the front closure shall have separate shell side and tube side bolting in hydrogen service.
Now I am wondering what the philosophy is behind this requirement. I have asked several colleagues but no one can convince me.

Can anyone assist me?

Many thanks in advance.

RE: Why apply seperated head front closures in hair pain type heat exchangers

Well, it's in the standard, and the standard is invoked, so no one should have to convince you.

If you're still curious, call API, and ask to speak to the crankiest old timer they've got. I'd be suspicious that the requirement may reflect a good defense against a single actual incident that happened long ago, and had really unfortunate consequences.

I can conjecture other reasons, too.
Imagine you're trying to assemble such a heat exchanger with a single row of bolting; you have to align the shell, the head and tube assembly, and the cap(s), with two gaskets, N studs, 2N nuts, and get everything nicely aligned, torqued down, and sealed. I'd bet you couldn't do it right on the first try.

Additionally, separate bolting allows you to remove the shell, and do a leak test on the tubes, head, and caps, without opening the process envelope or disturbing the process gaskets. Or conversely.

... but I'm just conjecturing. Please do come back and let us know if you find an actual historical reason.

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources