×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Undersized Grounding Electrode Conductor

Undersized Grounding Electrode Conductor

Undersized Grounding Electrode Conductor

(OP)
Hello everyone,

This is my first time posting to this forum and I had a question that I've been obsessing about for about a week now. I am an engineer in training and relatively new to this field, so I am still learning on a daily basis. The other day I noticed on one of my previous projects that I undersized my grounding electrode conductor and main bonding jumper. The project had an 800 amp main distribution panel with two sets of 500 kcmil for the service entrance. When I went to size the grounding electrode conductor, I accidentally sized it for only one set of 500 kcmil using table 250.66 in the NEC. Instead of using a 2/0 wire I used a 1/0 for my grounding electrode conductor size as well as my main bonding jumper. I know that having an undersized grounding electrode conductor can lead to the possibility that when there's a fault current, the cable could burn up when transferring the fault current to the grounding electrode, but I wanted to know if being off by one size (1/0 instead of 2/0) poses a huge compromise to safety or if the 1/0 would be able to handle most fault current situations. The project is already built and the contractor may have picked up on the mistake, but I needed some peace of mind on this question. This is a mistake that I surely won't be making in the future.

Best Regards

RE: Undersized Grounding Electrode Conductor

That question is more interesting than I first thought.
Note; I don't suggest ignoring the code, however the question has to do with the safety of the installation.
I don't have the NEC but:

The 2012 edition of the Canadian Electrical Code sizes the main bonding jumper based on the ampacity of the service conductors. The ampacity of parallel 500 MCM exceeds 800 Amps so 2/0 cable would be required.

The 2015 edition of the Canadian Electrical Code sizes the main bonding jumper based on the size of the service conductors.
If we consider the two 500 MCMs to be the equivalent of one 1000 MCM then a #1 AWG cable would be required.
However;
In the case of parallel feeders, The 2015 edition of the Canadian Electrical Code now requires the grounding conductor to be run in parallel also. If this were to be installed under the 2015 edition of the Canadian Electrical Code you would require a #3 AWG conductor to be run in close proximity to each group of 500 MCM conductors.
You may have slightly higher touch potentials.
Quite possibly the contractor felt that it would be cheaper to just use the proper cable than to argue with you and/or the AHJ.
This may be more of an issue of noncompliance with the current code.

Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter

RE: Undersized Grounding Electrode Conductor

This is both an ethics and safety question. This is a design error that causes the facility to not meet an electrical safety code. Code is law - that's why it's called a code and not a standard. You need to report your undersized grounding electrode conductor (GEC) to your supervisor and let them take the appropriate action to rectify the problem with the client. They may pursue a variance from the AHJ. You don't get peace of mind until the issue is resolved. Keep your head up and admit your mistake. Everybody makes them. It might hurt for a while, but you learned and won't do it again.

xnuke
"Live and act within the limit of your knowledge and keep expanding it to the limit of your life." Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged.
Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: Undersized Grounding Electrode Conductor

I would be much more concerned about the undersized main bonding jumper....that is the fault clearing path. The grounding electrode conductor plays a very small part in the fault clearing process.
What is being used as the grounding electrode? The NEC would permit a #6 copper grounding electrode conductor if the grounding electrode was a driven rod. The only grounding electrodes that actually require a "full size" (per Table 250.66) is a metal underground water pipe or building steel.

RE: Undersized Grounding Electrode Conductor

(OP)
Hey everyone,

Thank you for the responses, I appreciate the help. I have attached an image of the detail I used. The PE that I work under didn't seem to be super concerned about it. He said that if you have a fault condition that is enough to melt the 1/0 cable then you've got more problems to worry about then the grounding electrode conductor failing. I don't think he was concerned though because the contractor that we work with used the proper size in the field.

Best Regards

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources