×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Post Frame Building Analysis

Post Frame Building Analysis

Post Frame Building Analysis

(OP)
Once in a while PF buildings come up on the board but it seems a lot of engineers avoid them. My previous experience working on a PF building was a structure that was fully clad with 1/2" plywood (walls & roof), which made analysis easier since I am familiar with WSP diaphragms and shearwalls. I based a lot of my analysis methodology on the paper by Don Bender "Simplified Lateral Design of Post-Fram Buildings", which I found to be quite good and easier to use than the more rigorous method found in the ANSI/ASAE EP484.2.

With this next PF building I have a very simple structure, 21'x40' rectangle with posts at 8' o/c, 4:12 pitch roof. 2-ply truss @ 8' o/c that sandwiches 6x6 PT posts. Post height is 8' tall, with trusses resting on 2-2x6 ledgers attached to posts. The roof sheathing is 2x6 purlins @ 24" o/c with polycarb panels (26"x12').

There is no wall sheathing, the structure is completely open on all sides.

Based on this description you can see there are no shear walls, so the rigid roof design method used in the paper above is not applicable. My thinking on this analysis is that each "bent" or post-truss-post frame will pick up a tributary lateral wind load from the roof, essentially treating the roof diaphragm as flexible. Does this assumption or methodology seem reasonable or am I missing something here.

The lateral wind loads in the longitudinal direction should be comparatively negligible since there is no gable end cladding or gable walls, only a certain amount of cross sectional area of the truss and posts. I've always worried about wind drag on a structure but I don't have a good way to quantify this. Since the structure is very light seismic lateral loads will not govern but I'm always curious to run the numbers regardless just to see how it compares to the wind loads.

Another thing that comes to mind is how to check the loads on the polycarb panels. The panels are only spanning 24" between purlins, but a quick check of the allowable bending is prudent given a certain amount of snow load (25 psf). Does anyone have any reference design values for typical polycarb panels or could point me in the right direction?

A confused student is a good student.
Nathaniel P. Wilkerson, PE
www.medeek.com

RE: Post Frame Building Analysis

I basically agree with your approach.

In the 21' direction, each bent will take an 8' tributary width of wind load (I am willing to bet the 10 PSF minimum wind load will govern).

In the 40' direction, I would check the 12 posts as cantilevers, to resist the wind load. As you said, it won't be much load, but I think you should check to be sure.

Don't forget to check uplift--I think it will control the design of this structure.

I have never worked with polycarb panels, and I don't know if there are any diaphragm values. Perhaps the purlins just transfer the wind load to the bents by weak axis bending (actually, I think it will be biaxial bending).

DaveAtkins

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources