×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Automated vs manual steel microcleanliness

Automated vs manual steel microcleanliness

Automated vs manual steel microcleanliness

(OP)
Hi Friends.

I am looking at purchasing a new optical microscope that has automated inclusion analysis (image analysis) per ASTM E45. When the unit was demonstrated, it counted roughly 4X more D-thin inclusions in E45 Method D rating than our metallographer found. Another metallographer from a separate company verified our manual results. This is very typical of what we see with automated versus manual ratings.

Can someone help me to determine:
- Do the automated systems overestimate the ratings?
- Do manual ratings underestimate the inclusion amount?

Thanks in advance!

RE: Automated vs manual steel microcleanliness

I'd be curious as to how the quality of the polish influences the quality of the results from the automated system. My human eyes can distinguish between polishing artefacts and stringers pretty well, but I don't know how well software might handle that. Additionally, you might also consider the lighting conditions used by the automated camera. If the camera is using oblique lighting or similar illumination, I could imagine that would impact the quality of the automated data.

These are just some thoughts--I don't have experience with these types of automated softwares.

RE: Automated vs manual steel microcleanliness

My only tip would be to consider contacting Mr. George Vandervoort through his web site below. He is probably one of the most knowledgeable in the art of metallography and would be an opinion to consider for inclusion analysis.

http://www.georgevandervoort.com/metallography/spe...

RE: Automated vs manual steel microcleanliness

There are 2 factors that you will need to address. First, as Winston noted, you need to review the polishing protocol to make sure no artifacts are left behind that will be counted. At a minimum you should make sure to use a set of clean polishing and grinding cloths to reduce transfer. The other factor is to adjust the threshold sensitivity in your software so it correctly differentiates actual inclusions. You should end up with automated results that are close to your manual examination results after you make these adjustments (unless the manual method is not being performed correctly). Good luck!

RE: Automated vs manual steel microcleanliness

(OP)
Thanks Friends.

RE: Automated vs manual steel microcleanliness

Contact LECO about their image analysis software (if they still sell it). I helped them develop the software for their image analysis system back in 1995. One of the features that was absolutely necessary to have is the ability to exclude certain artifacts from the analysis that the software would pick up during the rating process. No matter how carefully you polish your specimens and threshold the system, you will still pick up false readings. And you need to have the ability to review the fields that were scanned and exclude those extraneous features. Otherwise, you will always question the results.

Maui

RE: Automated vs manual steel microcleanliness

(OP)
Hi Maui. The Leica software was able to do this and was quite user-friendly for removing artifacts. The problem is more on the high number of D-thin for E45 Method D, it would take longer to go through each field for these tiny inclusions than it would to just rate it manually.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources