NX Journal vs Macro - Why journals are much slower to run?
NX Journal vs Macro - Why journals are much slower to run?
(OP)
In NX 10, I created a macro to change the transparency of a part to 60%, and I assigned the macro to a button. I did the exact same task using a journal.
When I click on the macro button, it immediately changes the transparency of the part. However, when I click on the journal button, it takes around 2 second to run the task. They both successfully changes the transparency of the part. But, I am wondering why journal is much slower than macro?
I tried to improve the speed of the journal by compiling it to a dll, but it shows exactly same slowness.
I appreciate any comment in this regard.
When I click on the macro button, it immediately changes the transparency of the part. However, when I click on the journal button, it takes around 2 second to run the task. They both successfully changes the transparency of the part. But, I am wondering why journal is much slower than macro?
I tried to improve the speed of the journal by compiling it to a dll, but it shows exactly same slowness.
I appreciate any comment in this regard.





RE: NX Journal vs Macro - Why journals are much slower to run?
Regards,
Tomas
RE: NX Journal vs Macro - Why journals are much slower to run?
Mark Rief
NX CAM Customer Success
Siemens PLM Software
RE: NX Journal vs Macro - Why journals are much slower to run?
www.nxjournaling.com
RE: NX Journal vs Macro - Why journals are much slower to run?
Isn't there a way to load the .dlls at ug startup but leave them into the "Application" folder ?
A specific variable maybe ?