×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
• Talk With Other Members
• Be Notified Of Responses
• Keyword Search
Favorite Forums
• Automated Signatures
• Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Replacing 'bedrock' layer with a "Mohr-coulomb" in Slope/w

Replacing 'bedrock' layer with a "Mohr-coulomb" in Slope/w

(OP)
Hi,

I have a model where I replaced the bedrock layer with a "Mohr-coulomb" soil (Unit weight 21, Phi 35). Now the FoS has increased. Can somebody explain this? Does this mean bedrock's strength parameters are lesser than the soil stated above?

Sorry for a very basic question.

RE: Replacing 'bedrock' layer with a "Mohr-coulomb" in Slope/w

No way to tell from the information you have posted. We would need to know the geometry, the other soil strengths, piezometric line(s), location of critical failure surfaces, etc.

I suggest you look at the convergence data and the interslice forces for both runs.

I expect that you will find errors in one or both of the runs. Make sure you look for negative side forces.

Also, you do not provide the units for you unit weight so I do not know if 21 is reasonable or not.

Mike Lambert

RE: Replacing 'bedrock' layer with a "Mohr-coulomb" in Slope/w

The judicious use of the Bedrock material truncates the modeled failure surface downward (or outward) extension, resulting in a shorter failure surface, which results in a lower FOS. It is a geometry problem. Carefully observe the pictures of the computed failure surfaces, which are generated by the program.

I have made use of this when the observed slope failures were 'circular' until reaching a specific horizon, at which point the observed failure was along the limiting horizon. I have used the 'bedrock material' to accomplish a modeled surface which matches that observed in the field. As a side note, I have also used the 'tension crack' (without water filling) to also achieve modeled geometry which nearly matches the field observations.

I must point out that the actual limiting soil/rock horizon is sometimes only somewhat 'stronger' than the upper failed soils and my 1st inclination was to assign a 'Mohr-Coulomb' soil.

RE: Replacing 'bedrock' layer with a "Mohr-coulomb" in Slope/w

(OP)
Thanks emmgjld. Very insightful.
Thanks Mike Lambert too, for the response.

RE: Replacing 'bedrock' layer with a "Mohr-coulomb" in Slope/w

Emmgjld - I have also used a similar method that you have discussed for modelling a slip similar to field observations. Instead of using a bedrock material I just forced the slip to fail above the denser material which is what we believed happened. in Slide6 there is an option to force your failure surface through selected points.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

• Talk To Other Members
• Notification Of Responses To Questions
• Favorite Forums One Click Access
• Keyword Search Of All Posts, And More...

Register now while it's still free!