×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

IBC Sprinkler Height

IBC Sprinkler Height

IBC Sprinkler Height

(OP)
Hello,

I know this is an NFPA forum, but maybe some of you have the expertise in IBC as well.

IBC 2015 mentions in Section 404.3 that sprinklers are not required where the ceiling of atrium is above 55 ft height. In the "IBC Code and Commentary" they explain that sprinkler systems are no longer effective at 55 ft and that installing them provides little benefits.

Does anyone know what they’re basing this explanation on? Is there any paper/criteria that allow us to know whether sprinklers are effective or not if they’re on a certain height? If performance based design is the answer, what criteria should be considered in making our study?

Thanks for your help.

RE: IBC Sprinkler Height

Cannot answer your question, but has been in IBC since the 2003 edition

RE: IBC Sprinkler Height

The assumption is based on IBC Section 909.9. One wants the smallest design fire as possible so as to limit the size of the air handling equipment. Atrium designs are sensitive to the size of the fuel package and generally speaking, the design fire assumptions place limits on what the owner is allowed. Secondly, neither the engineer nor owner want to introduce a fuel load that is so great in a 60 foot tall atrium that the smoke cannot be cooled by the volume.

As to the basis of the 55 foot number, I seem to remember it was based on a literature search of European FP Engineering research, but I'm getting older so my answer is questionable.

RE: IBC Sprinkler Height

FM did some full scale fire burn test about 10 years ago. The sprinklers don't get the heat they need to operate at these high ceiling heights.

RE: IBC Sprinkler Height

In tall areas, like atria, the smoke will stratify somewhere between the floor and ceiling based on smoke layer temperature and ambient temperature. Since the smoke will stratify we don't have smoke detectors at the ceiling, we generally look for beam detection at some calculated height.

This same concept applies for the heat movement towards the ceiling. As the heat rises it will cool, the amount it cools is based on the fire heat release rate, fire area, and ambient temperature. With tall spaces this cooling effect becomes more significant and generally results in sprinklers not activating...it's hard to hold 165F at the sprinkler location for sufficient time to operate because of this cooling effect. I've discussed with AHJs the omission of ceiling sprinklers in these situations and the addition of added detection or notification, it's usually met with positive results.

As mentioned previously, FM has performed testing and agree that sprinklers aren't nearly as effective in opening at these heights. You can also consult NFPA 92 for some discussion on heat layers and calculation methods.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources