Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall
Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall
(OP)
Here's a Question...
Say I have a basement, 12 ft tall from slab on grade basement slab to top of plywood sub-floor. Floor construction is 24" deep floor trusses.
One the other side of the basement wall is all fill, and instead of a wood floor system, i have slab on grade at almost the same elevation as my plywood sub-floor.
My original thought was to design as a cantilevered retaining wall with all surcharges as required.
Owner comes back and says no cantilevered retaining wall, they'll just temporarily shore the wall.
So then lateral forces at the top of the wall must get resisted in one of two ways: send the earth force at the top of the wall into the plywood diaphragm and block the hell out of it..
Or develop the top of wall forces into the high concrete slab on grade with dowels.
Any thoughts on the things i should check when choosing the latter?
Thanks,
Say I have a basement, 12 ft tall from slab on grade basement slab to top of plywood sub-floor. Floor construction is 24" deep floor trusses.
One the other side of the basement wall is all fill, and instead of a wood floor system, i have slab on grade at almost the same elevation as my plywood sub-floor.
My original thought was to design as a cantilevered retaining wall with all surcharges as required.
Owner comes back and says no cantilevered retaining wall, they'll just temporarily shore the wall.
So then lateral forces at the top of the wall must get resisted in one of two ways: send the earth force at the top of the wall into the plywood diaphragm and block the hell out of it..
Or develop the top of wall forces into the high concrete slab on grade with dowels.
Any thoughts on the things i should check when choosing the latter?
Thanks,






RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall
RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall
Other stuff to check:
1) resisting soil drag.
2) tension in SOG.
3) SOG to wall connection...
I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.
RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall
I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.
RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall
RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall
RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall
RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall
Depending on the extents of the SOG and what it's connected to (other than your retaining wall), it could cave in with the soil.
RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall
KootK, I'd imagine the beam to the perpendicular wall condition.
Jay and Mike, I agree it can be done that way (into wood diaphragm) but just checking on the other option.
Teguci, care to elaborate?
RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall
RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall
What is span of the 24" floor trusses and are there perpendicular walls there that could buttress the subject wall?
I often try to get the wall to span horizontally when I am not happy with the capacity of the plywood floor assembly.
How far across the building/floor to the other side of the plywood floor?
I like kgengr's idea but for a fixed base, the footing needs to be able to prevent rotation so...I think there is some judgment there. Depending on the soils, that might be tough to get comfortable with (without getting close to the wide footing the owner is already saying "no" to).
RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall
So the beam is actually spanning along the wall to some kind of support rather than dragging the load into the SOG as tension? I've done something similar for sections of basement wall behind stairwells where there is no diaphragm to lean on. I've done it by casting a concrete girt a couple of feet below the exterior slab as a second pour. That way, it becomes an element that is quite obviously an important part of the building structure and not subject to later removal. It can be a building envelope problem as you can imagine.
I believe that some of the trepidation that you're hearing here regarding the SOG solution comes from concern for mobilizing soil friction which would just end up getting transferred back to the wall again as additional soil pressure. You ultimately end up needing to reach out quite a ways beyond the wall for reliable tension resistane. I tried to convey the notion in the sketch below. Let me know if it's inadequate. I'm finding this a difficult thing to describe for some reason. I guess I'm saying something along the lines of "circular load path".
I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.
RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall
So is there a concrete (ha) reason for not using the slab to resist the forces?
RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall
2. Slab on grade will need to be designed to ACI 318 standards - it is now a structural slab and not just a slab on grade
3. Consider the possibility that a sewer line or something will need to be trenched and the slab will be cut.
4. You will only get a small amount of shear friction from the weight of the slab on the soil.
5. It is fairly standard to put this lateral load into the plywood flooring system.
6. You will need to develop the reinforcement on both sides of any control/construction joints - don't use dowels to allow volume change.
Not saying I wouldn't do it (I have), but you should have some very good reasons to support this uncommon solution.
RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall
I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.
RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall
What you're saying definitely makes sense, i get the circular pattern that develops.
But what if instead of an actual "beam", i just say the slab is a series of smaller beams, whose depth is the slab depth, and whose width is the bar spacing in a sense.
If i did that, I should continue this tension rebar all the way to the other side of the slab and into that foundation wall, correct? The tension force needs to be carried the whole way across the slab via rebar, right?.
RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall
I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.
RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall
RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall
I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.
RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall
RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall
Maybe also using a geogrid to reduce the soil pressure. Trying to design a floor diaphragm to resist 12' of fill on a 90 ft wall will be very complicated and unlikely to get built properly. Better make sure your insurance is paid up.
RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall
RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall
Is there soil backfill up to a similar height on the opposite side of the basement?
I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.
RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall
RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall
I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.
RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall
Another thing to consider is that the fill under the slab will inevitably settle, so the slab on grade has to be reinforced to span onto the wall, at least for some distance.
RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall
1) Sequencing they always seem to want to backfill before the floor is in place.
2) There are usually large lightwells on at least one side which means the basement wall is not connected to the floor diaphragm.
3) There is usually a stair opening near the basement wall which would require special detailing.
10-12" thick basement wall with 14-16" basement matslab is pretty much the norm for our area.
RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall
RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall
I have stair openings as well, CMU stair shafts though. I've thought about using those as a sort of buttress.
RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall
I can imagine a few scenarios.
In other words-what is the real problem he wants to solve (cost, space limitations or over excavation issue, time, weather...).
You know, the usual stuff.
RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall
Maybe between using those and some exterior buttresses you can keep him happy.