×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall

Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall

Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall

(OP)
Here's a Question...

Say I have a basement, 12 ft tall from slab on grade basement slab to top of plywood sub-floor. Floor construction is 24" deep floor trusses.

One the other side of the basement wall is all fill, and instead of a wood floor system, i have slab on grade at almost the same elevation as my plywood sub-floor.

My original thought was to design as a cantilevered retaining wall with all surcharges as required.

Owner comes back and says no cantilevered retaining wall, they'll just temporarily shore the wall.

So then lateral forces at the top of the wall must get resisted in one of two ways: send the earth force at the top of the wall into the plywood diaphragm and block the hell out of it..

Or develop the top of wall forces into the high concrete slab on grade with dowels.

Any thoughts on the things i should check when choosing the latter?

Thanks,

RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall

I would try to use the slab somehow for the permanent load. 12 ft. of backfill is huge for a floor diaphragm. You also have to get the load out of the diaphragm once it is in there.

RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall

They key thing that you should consider is the degree of permanence of the exterior slab on grade that your building will be reliant on for stability. The most common solution is to rely on the adjacent wood floor diaphragm.

Other stuff to check:

1) resisting soil drag.
2) tension in SOG.
3) SOG to wall connection...

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall

Would your slab be a tension member dragging load to the soil or a beam that spans to perpendicular walls somewhere?

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall

I've never had an issue getting a wood floor to resist the backfill pressures. Even on tall walls, I've had them temporarily brace the wall during backfilling procedures because they usually want to backfill at least partially before the wood floor is in place.

RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall

Agreed with jayrod. Simpson has some nice connectors for this application. Keep an eye on diaphragm shear, though.

RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall

Don't develop the load into the slab on grade that is sitting on top of your retained soil - super bad idea.

RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall

I would put the load into the wood diaphragm.

Depending on the extents of the SOG and what it's connected to (other than your retaining wall), it could cave in with the soil.

RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall

(OP)
Slab on grade extends about 30ft, then terminates atop the buildings exterior foundation wall. I would then probably dowel SOG into top of that wall. That wall is only 4ft deep, and I'd imagine would have some slidding resistance to help out.

KootK, I'd imagine the beam to the perpendicular wall condition.

Jay and Mike, I agree it can be done that way (into wood diaphragm) but just checking on the other option.

Teguci, care to elaborate?

RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall

I would design this as fixed-base & pinned-top and take the load into the wood diaphragm, distribute to shear walls.

RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall

How long is this wall?
What is span of the 24" floor trusses and are there perpendicular walls there that could buttress the subject wall?
I often try to get the wall to span horizontally when I am not happy with the capacity of the plywood floor assembly.

How far across the building/floor to the other side of the plywood floor?

I like kgengr's idea but for a fixed base, the footing needs to be able to prevent rotation so...I think there is some judgment there. Depending on the soils, that might be tough to get comfortable with (without getting close to the wide footing the owner is already saying "no" to).

RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall

Quote (OP)

KootK, I'd imagine the beam to the perpendicular wall condition.

So the beam is actually spanning along the wall to some kind of support rather than dragging the load into the SOG as tension? I've done something similar for sections of basement wall behind stairwells where there is no diaphragm to lean on. I've done it by casting a concrete girt a couple of feet below the exterior slab as a second pour. That way, it becomes an element that is quite obviously an important part of the building structure and not subject to later removal. It can be a building envelope problem as you can imagine.

I believe that some of the trepidation that you're hearing here regarding the SOG solution comes from concern for mobilizing soil friction which would just end up getting transferred back to the wall again as additional soil pressure. You ultimately end up needing to reach out quite a ways beyond the wall for reliable tension resistane. I tried to convey the notion in the sketch below. Let me know if it's inadequate. I'm finding this a difficult thing to describe for some reason. I guess I'm saying something along the lines of "circular load path".

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall

(OP)
Wall is about 90 ft long, no walls to act as buttresses.

So is there a concrete (ha) reason for not using the slab to resist the forces?

RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall

1. You will need to ignore any resistance of the first 18 ft or so of the slab since it is being resisted by the retaining wall you are trying to support - pulling yourself up on a falling rope
2. Slab on grade will need to be designed to ACI 318 standards - it is now a structural slab and not just a slab on grade
3. Consider the possibility that a sewer line or something will need to be trenched and the slab will be cut.
4. You will only get a small amount of shear friction from the weight of the slab on the soil.
5. It is fairly standard to put this lateral load into the plywood flooring system.
6. You will need to develop the reinforcement on both sides of any control/construction joints - don't use dowels to allow volume change.

Not saying I wouldn't do it (I have), but you should have some very good reasons to support this uncommon solution.

RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall

7. Strain compatibility. You might need 1/2" or more of axial displacement in the SOG to resist the lateral load imposed on it. How much load will be absorbed into your diaphragm once that movement occurs?

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall

(OP)
Koot,

What you're saying definitely makes sense, i get the circular pattern that develops.

But what if instead of an actual "beam", i just say the slab is a series of smaller beams, whose depth is the slab depth, and whose width is the bar spacing in a sense.

If i did that, I should continue this tension rebar all the way to the other side of the slab and into that foundation wall, correct? The tension force needs to be carried the whole way across the slab via rebar, right?.

RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall

It might be time for another sketch to illustrate what you're suggesting. Based on what you've told us above, my understanding is that the SOG is acting as a tension tie and not as any kind of beam/girt (be it a big one or a bunch of little ones. If that's true, then you just need to go far enough past the retained soil with the designated tension rebar to feel comfortable that you've developed your soil friction beyond the vertical line in my sketch above. I've never seen it before but I suppose you could even introduce a shear key into your SOG kinda like we use sometimes on retaining walls. Like I said at the top though, I'm not a big fan of the system in general.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall

He's saying the slab is a tension member that is ANCHORED AT THE FAR SIDE into the foundation wall over there. No soil friction would be involved.

RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall

So lateral resistance will be provided by SOG attachment to an entirely separate building? I'm liking this less and less all the time.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall

The full at rest earth pressure from the 4 ft wall will only be about 1/3 of the tension reaction required for the 12ft wall. Even if you put your 4 ft wall into full passive pressure, you are going to have a tough time resolving the loads (you may want to provide grade beams to put some moment into your 4 ft tall shear key).

RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall

If you can't use the slab or a retaining wall, I would be looking at exterior buttresses or even the propped cantilever idea that was previously suggested. Also could use helical tie-backs.
Maybe also using a geogrid to reduce the soil pressure. Trying to design a floor diaphragm to resist 12' of fill on a 90 ft wall will be very complicated and unlikely to get built properly. Better make sure your insurance is paid up.

RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall

Thanks for the sketch. Grabbing the wall is certainly better than not grabbing the wall. As others have suggested though, a quantitative analysis should still be performed.

Is there soil backfill up to a similar height on the opposite side of the basement?

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall

(OP)
On the side of the basement not shown? To the right of sketch? If so, no, it's a walk out.

RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall

Yeah, that side. No relief there.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall

I agree with XR250 about not using a wood diaphragm to brace this wall.

Another thing to consider is that the fill under the slab will inevitably settle, so the slab on grade has to be reinforced to span onto the wall, at least for some distance.

RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall

Maybe we just have different methods and type of construction where I practice, but we always design these walls cantilevered from the basement.

1) Sequencing they always seem to want to backfill before the floor is in place.

2) There are usually large lightwells on at least one side which means the basement wall is not connected to the floor diaphragm.

3) There is usually a stair opening near the basement wall which would require special detailing.

10-12" thick basement wall with 14-16" basement matslab is pretty much the norm for our area.

RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall

The stair openings really make these difficult.

RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall

(OP)
Cantilevering the wall really does make it a simpler solution. It was my first choice but owner preferred not to. Might be time to go back to them.

I have stair openings as well, CMU stair shafts though. I've thought about using those as a sort of buttress.

RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall

It would be helpful to know WHY the owner does not want to go the cantilevered wall route.
I can imagine a few scenarios.
In other words-what is the real problem he wants to solve (cost, space limitations or over excavation issue, time, weather...).
You know, the usual stuff.

RE: Resisting Lateral Forces at Top of Foundation Wall

Quote (JNEnginr)

I have stair openings as well, CMU stair shafts though. I've thought about using those as a sort of buttress.

Maybe between using those and some exterior buttresses you can keep him happy.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources