×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Tie in point - Big diameter difference
2

Tie in point - Big diameter difference

Tie in point - Big diameter difference

(OP)
In the project that I’m involved we are now in the design phase. I’m more from quality control and assurance but I want to help. We have right now an issue regarding the tie in point of our pipeline and a pipeline of other facility. The question is that the flow rate is the same and our pipe diameter is much bigger than the one that we will tie in. This will cause a velocity problem isn’t it? How can we solve this?

RE: Tie in point - Big diameter difference

Velocity difference, of course, velocity problem, don't know. Give us a few details, but beware there are no fixed rules on velocity. What is acceptable in one situation may be unacceptable in another.

Make the pipe bigger??

Remember - More details = better answers
Also: If you get a response it's polite to respond to it.

RE: Tie in point - Big diameter difference

(OP)
Our pipeline is 18 inches and will tie in on a 8 inches from an existing facility.
Flow rates 1000m3/s.

RE: Tie in point - Big diameter difference

You can at least expect a large pressure drop there, as excess static pressure, if available, will be used to accelerate the fluid to that higher velocity.

RE: Tie in point - Big diameter difference

(OP)
But it's expected to have cavitation and turbulence problems right? Is there any way to solve this?
Maybe to reduce our pipe diameter before the tie-in?

RE: Tie in point - Big diameter difference

Gas or liquid? Let's assume gas (if it is water then the velocity is on the order of 20,000 ft/s in the 18 inch). Let's assume that your m3/s is SCM/s. Without knowing pressures or the flow rate in the 8-inch it is really hard to predict if there is a problem or not.

At that rate (call it 3 BSCF/day) at a nominal 1000 psig you would have 290 ft/s in the 18 inch and nearly 1470 ft/s in the 8-inch (assuming your gas is the only thing in the line). 1470 ft/s is 1.06 Mach and it isn't happening. You would need pressure on your 18-inch well above 1500 psig (with nothing else in the 8-inch) for this to work with compressible flow calculations.

David Simpson, PE
MuleShoe Engineering

In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual. Galileo Galilei, Italian Physicist

RE: Tie in point - Big diameter difference

1000m3/s? ponder What is the application?

If the flowrate is the same, how come you're designing a much larger pipe? Also, I don't understand how you can tie-in a large diameter into a small diameter. Hydraulics are not going to look good.

RE: Tie in point - Big diameter difference

(OP)
My mistake, sorry. 1000m3/h.
We are talking about a new depot (ULP, ADO, JET and HFO), those are the dimensions of the pipelines to the new tank farm.
But we must connect the pipelines from the ships offloading directly to other private terminals and there we have the problem with the existing pipes dimensions.

RE: Tie in point - Big diameter difference

(OP)
And 500kPag at our tank farm.

RE: Tie in point - Big diameter difference

For 8" line and 1,000 m3/hr, velocities are in the range of 8 m/sec and pressure drop anywhere between 1-2 bar (100-200 kPa) for densities between 800-900 kg/m3 and dynamic viscosity between 1 and 5 cP. Long-distance 8" line is simply not going to work (massive pressure losses) at 1,000 m3/hr design flow, as pointed by everyone in this thread.

18" line results in velocities <2 m/sec and that looks good from design point of view.

Dejan IVANOVIC
Process Engineer, MSChE

RE: Tie in point - Big diameter difference

2
This post is getting out of control very fast.

Tuga29 - draw out your schematic and add numbers and check them - flowrate, pressures, distances then come back.

1000m3/hr of liquid in an 8" pipe is just stupid. Can be done but makes no sense and you can generate significant surge forces or static charge.

However your description is all over the place and doesn't make sense.

Remember - More details = better answers
Also: If you get a response it's polite to respond to it.

RE: Tie in point - Big diameter difference

(OP)
Thank you for all your answers and interest and sorry about my explanations.

The 1000m3/h was a client requirement and today we see that it was wrong since the existing network distribution works with 500m3/h. Now we just need to see if with the cargo pumps (100 to 130m head) we could reach the furthest tank, about 8km of pipeline.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources