×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

AASHTO Simplified Earth Pressure

AASHTO Simplified Earth Pressure

AASHTO Simplified Earth Pressure

(OP)
In working with Figure 3.11.5.6-6 in the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Manual, I am finding conflicting opinions on how to handle the increased embedment of 1.2D. I consulted a Geotechnical engineer who stated the 1.2D is performed to achieve a F.S.=1.5. I reviewed references stating the 1.2 factor is used to account for differences between the simplified method and the conventional method and is not a factor of safety. Those references would apply a factor of safety by reducing the passive pressure (as I would commonly do), find the point of moment equilibrium and finally increase the embedment by 20% when using the simplified method.

I would appreciate it if anyone could share their thoughts, experiences or perhaps references that reinforce either position. Thank you in advance.

RE: AASHTO Simplified Earth Pressure

(OP)
Any help is greatly appreciated.

RE: AASHTO Simplified Earth Pressure

My understanding is "D" is minimum embedment for individual elements, such as soldier piles and "DO" is for a continuous wall, such as sheet piling. The DOT that I primarily work with adds 30% to the minimum embedment.

They also require that KP be reduced by 1.5 for permanent walls and 1.25 for temporary walls, which is an additional safety factor.

I hope I didn't muddy up the waters for you.

RE: AASHTO Simplified Earth Pressure

(OP)
bridgebuster - Thank you for the reply. I have had similar experiences and tend to agree with the method you outlined. I posted the question to see what others thought and if they had any additional information to support either case. I recently received comments indicating the additional embedment was to provide a factor of safety and reduction of the passive pressure was not required if an increase in embedment was implemented. Though I disagree with the comment, I would like a better understanding of the additional embedment outlined in AASHTO before committing to either approach. Thanks again for your input.

RE: AASHTO Simplified Earth Pressure

I'm glad to have been of help. You can also contact AASHTO and pose the question to them.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources