use of centerline for pattern of features…
use of centerline for pattern of features…
(OP)
What does the centerline mean when used to show a pattern of features?
Does it mean only to indicate all the features individually within the pattern or does/can it mean an average location of the features in aggregate?
Attached is a drawing example for this question... to me, both examples shown mean the same thing am I wrong?

lightweight, cheap, strong... pick 2
Does it mean only to indicate all the features individually within the pattern or does/can it mean an average location of the features in aggregate?
Attached is a drawing example for this question... to me, both examples shown mean the same thing am I wrong?

lightweight, cheap, strong... pick 2





RE: use of centerline for pattern of features…
Also, if you are in compliance with ASME Y14.5, "pattern" means "two or more features or features of size to which a locational geometric tolerance is applied ..." etc.
Since you don't use geometric tolerances, neither of your pictures represents a "pattern"
"For every expert there is an equal and opposite expert"
Arthur C. Clarke Profiles of the future
RE: use of centerline for pattern of features…
----------------------------------------
The Help for this program was created in Windows Help format, which depends on a feature that isn't included in this version of Windows.
RE: use of centerline for pattern of features…
"4 features as they share a common centerline".
What is a common centerline?
And how you determine that?
Thank you
RE: use of centerline for pattern of features…
So without the use of a geometric tolerance, the centerline only means the .500 dimension applies to all 4 features independently, the same thing as “4X .500”
Gabimot, the common centerline is determined visually by the features lining up with only one centerline, if any of the features sharing a centerline are not in fact on that line even by a micron it is the drafters responsibility to indicate that with another dimension.
lightweight, cheap, strong... pick 2
RE: use of centerline for pattern of features…
" the common centerline is determined visually by the features lining up with only one centerline, if any of the features sharing a centerline are not in fact on that line even by a micron it is the drafters responsibility to indicate that with another dimension"
I just learn something new: centerline is determined visually..............
And also I learn to transfer the responsibilities from the engineers to the drafters.......In other words if an engineer is incompetent and does not how to dimension the drawing, it is the drafter responsibility.
RE: use of centerline for pattern of features…
lightweight, cheap, strong... pick 2
RE: use of centerline for pattern of features…
I still think gabimot’s question is legitimate. Can you find the common centerline definition is the standard?
There are examples of features being coaxial such as A-B datum feature compound.
RE: use of centerline for pattern of features…
lightweight, cheap, strong... pick 2
RE: use of centerline for pattern of features…
So, I will ask what you cannot make it perfect? The dimension or the feature?
RE: use of centerline for pattern of features…
Just showing 4x .500 is just a drafting practice but does not imply the measurements must be taken from the same point.
Anybody else agree or disagree with my statements?
RE: use of centerline for pattern of features…
Centreline is an unfortunate term here. It is obviously not a centreline. It is a dimension line. On SolidWorks, I systematically dimension to the furthest hole. I can then inspect along the dimension line and verify that the holes indeed all are on the line. Sometimes, they aren't.
I only do the 4X .500 on a complicated drawing when the long dimension line adds excessively to the mess. Sometimes, it is safer to dimension some of the holes separately.
--
JHG
RE: use of centerline for pattern of features…
If you go 4X .500 on your drawing, I would assume that everything on the dimension line is located to whatever default tolerances are called up on your title block. Your example is harmless because it is a pattern, officially or otherwise. The holes all are the same size and probably need to be located to the same tolerance. Perhaps 4X .500±.010.
Things get messy when you have more than one type of hole on your dimension line, each of which requires a different locating tolerance. The nice thing about GD&T is that it places the positional tolerance on the hole specification, where it belongs.
--
JHG
RE: use of centerline for pattern of features…
I think this is being made more complicated than it actually is.
As shown in the example, it is indeed a centerline. A dimension line has no breaks.
It defines the vertical plane coincident with the hole(s) axis.
Tolerance-wise, there is no difference between a common centerline versus specifying the number of occurances and is often used to "simplify" a drawing, making it easier to interpret (especially if there a many holes which may cause confusion as to which dimension applies to which hole).
"Know the rules well, so you can break them effectively."
-Dalai Lama XIV
RE: use of centerline for pattern of features…
Could you, PLEASE, be more explicit of this approach. Is it a perfect plane? is it an imperfect plane? How you determine that plane?
Also, could you indicate the support from the standard for your approach?
RE: use of centerline for pattern of features…
A common centerline is only a convenience to define multiple instances of a dimension when taken from a common starting point (edge, feature, face, whatever).
It is the same as separate centerlines having one locating dimension with the number of occurances included. The same tolerances would be involved.
If you need some holes located to a tighter tolerance, either dimension them separately or use GD&T.
AFAIK the standards don't cover this specifically, but do use this method in examples. The standards don't cover much of what is basic drafting.
"Know the rules well, so you can break them effectively."
-Dalai Lama XIV