×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

"Standard" Cold Formed Steel Box Beam?
2

"Standard" Cold Formed Steel Box Beam?

"Standard" Cold Formed Steel Box Beam?

(OP)
Please take a look at the attached image from the Steel Stud Mfrs Assoc. - the question is: if a boxed header is chosen from the table, does it come "off the truck" pre-manufactured with NO seam welds/cap & screws required to be specified by the EOR? I'll withhold my thought briefly. Thanks

RE: "Standard" Cold Formed Steel Box Beam?

You need to be careful by using the members from the tables which do not tell you anything about the loads and connection details. The structural engineers need to understand the basics, and load path through the member, select the size and detail accordingly.

First; can you imagine there are two members attached each other, and no weld/bolt/bonding connection.

Second: these type of beams are from the material with high strength properties. So welding always is a problem, or difficult.

Third: You need to be careful for the load transfer on the faces of the member since the walls are not thick enough. The same apply at the ends of the beam. You need to think about how you will transfer the loads from the beam to the supporting members. Connection elements
such as punching with screw might be needed, and you will be concentration on the details of the connection.

The limitation in the deflection is mostly a code requirement for industrial/building application. The box member is better selection for the torsional applications in addition to other actions, but you still need to validate that your application is safe, at least meets the code requirements.

Corrosion protection is another issue with uncapped member that you need to take care.

RE: "Standard" Cold Formed Steel Box Beam?

The boxed headers are built from studs. They are typically assembled with a track on the top or bottom. For some ideas on the construction, see SSMAs details at http://www.ssma.com/filebin/pdf/SSMA_Details.pdf. Cold formed steel s commonly connected with screws or welds. Often times, welded and screwed alternatives are provided because some contractors prefer welds and some prefer screws.

RE: "Standard" Cold Formed Steel Box Beam?

Back to back headers can be a better option in some cases as there is more resistance to web crippling and easier to insulate. That being said, I usually specify boxed headers. If the load is not too high, I sometimes just specify a single heavy track.

RE: "Standard" Cold Formed Steel Box Beam?

Quote (OP)

if a boxed header is chosen from the table, does it come "off the truck" pre-manufactured with NO seam welds/cap & screws required to be specified by the EOR

The built up members come from the originating supplier (Dietrich etc) unassembled. Depending on the market and the specialty contractor:

1) Assembly may occur on site or in a fabrication shop.

2) Assembly details may be provided by the EOR.

3) Assembly details may be delegated to a specialty engineer working in behalf of the light gauge contractor.

That's my understanding at least.

Quote (XR250)

That being said, I usually specify boxed headers. If the load is not too high,

Given the advantages that you mentioned did back to back, why do you usually go with box headers? Torsion/LTB? Connections?

Quote (XR250)

, I sometimes just specify a single heavy track.

Interesting. Oriented as track or strong axis?

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: "Standard" Cold Formed Steel Box Beam?

Quote (KootK)

Given the advantages that you mentioned did back to back, why do you usually go with box headers? Torsion/LTB? Connections?

It really depends on what the metal stud sub wants me to specify. For long spans, the boxed is nice as it has better weak axis strength (if needed)

Quote (XR250)
, I sometimes just specify a single heavy track.

Interesting. Oriented as track or strong axis?

Usually weak axis but this is more for non-load bearing jobs where i am only supporting wall DL. The other thing I do sometimes if the arch. conditions allow, is to use a single, light track for the head of the opening and then screw a "strongback" stud to the rear of the wall above the dropped ceiling that spans from jamb to jamb. The track then only has to carry out of plane loads. Boxed headers are labor intensive so anything to simplify the job is appreciated by my clients. I think Dietrich still makes a super deep leg track that can be used for a header that sits on top of the wall, legs down.

RE: "Standard" Cold Formed Steel Box Beam?

Torsion in a box beam means a critical seam weld. Welds are to AWS or AISI? Welder qualifications for light gage? etc.
This is generally left up to the EOR to sort out. It can be delegated but it doesn't go away.
So far I've stayed away from all structural welding of light gage.

RE: "Standard" Cold Formed Steel Box Beam?

(OP)
Thanks all! My hunch was as you describe KootK. XR250, while mine is not a wall header scenario, I do have a potential torsion issue on one of my load cases. I will be using a box beam with tracks on top and bottom and appropriate fasteners specified joining the capping tracks to main strong-axis sections.

RE: "Standard" Cold Formed Steel Box Beam?

(OP)
Buggar - I've got light torsional loads and aim to resolve the torsional moment into eq and opp weak axis loads at top and bottom of the box beam (resisted by the strong axis of the track shapes). Would you steer clear of that approach for light loads?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources