×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Circuit unbalance code stipulation

Circuit unbalance code stipulation

Circuit unbalance code stipulation

(OP)
Hello all, I have a basic question regarding low voltage branch circuiting. (moved from Motors section)

Would anyone be able to point me to a code stipulation (NEC) which requires a minimum amount of balance within a three phase branch circuit?

For example, if I had a three phase branch circuit which fed a "black box" (like an industrial process load) that had an inherent load unbalance where the neutral carried up to say, 50% of the max line current, would this be allowable by code?


Thanks,

RE: Circuit unbalance code stipulation

In my opinion, NEC does not recommend any voltage unbalance limits-except the voltage drop of 3% per branch or feeder and total 5% for branch and feeder together.
As I know the supply voltage unbalance limit recommendation is in:
American National Standard for Electric Power Systems and Equipment -Voltage Ratings (60 Hz), ANSI C84.1-2006 Annex C (Informative) Polyphase voltage unbalance C.2 Recommendation:
"Electric supply systems should be designed and operated to limit the maximum voltage unbalance to 3 percent when measured at the electric-utility revenue meter under no-load conditions."

RE: Circuit unbalance code stipulation

Under neutral conductors you may find a rule to the effect that neutral conductors shall have adequate ampacity to carry any unbalanced currents.
The implied corollary of this is that the current unbalance will be limited by the rated ampacity of the neutral conductors and busses.
It is good practice to connect unbalanced loads on different phases in such a way as to limit the total current unbalance on the panel.
Single phase loads are allowed to be connected phase to phase and, subject to suitable system grounding methods, are allowed to be connected phase to neutral.

Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter

RE: Circuit unbalance code stipulation

no, not a NEC requirement, but it is best practice to balance loads as much as possible to limit breaker tripping

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources