×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Implicit vs Explicit Solver for Wave propagation problems
2

Implicit vs Explicit Solver for Wave propagation problems

Implicit vs Explicit Solver for Wave propagation problems

(OP)
Dear Eng-tip users,

I have a question regarding the analysis of shock wave propagation problems in structures using FEM. Recently I was told that it is not possible to model shock wave propagation using implicit FEM schemes. The argument was that implicit schemes do not include this phenomena in their formulation... I am aware that explicit methods are generally recommended in cases like this cause they are far more efficient for problems of this nature. However, excluding computational efficiency, is there really any other reason preventing a shock wave problem from being solved with an implicit solver?

Thank you for your answers :)

RE: Implicit vs Explicit Solver for Wave propagation problems

It is possible, but not efficient.

RE: Implicit vs Explicit Solver for Wave propagation problems

(OP)
Thanks for the answer!

RE: Implicit vs Explicit Solver for Wave propagation problems

There is absolutely no theoretical limitation to solving a shock wave propagation problem using an implicit scheme. However, there are enormous practical limitations - which is why explicit schemes (I think it was von Neumann who invented first such scheme, but I am not sure) became popular in the first place.

Both implicit and explicit numerical schemes are just recipes to solve the underlying differential equation (which, supposedly, is a decent abstraction of the reality).

*********************************************************
Are you new to this forum? If so, please read these FAQs:

http://www.eng-tips.com/faqs.cfm?fid=376
http://www.eng-tips.com/faqs.cfm?fid=1083

RE: Implicit vs Explicit Solver for Wave propagation problems

(OP)
Thank you for your answer! It is clearer now.

RE: Implicit vs Explicit Solver for Wave propagation problems

I should have been a little more careful with my strong statements above: There are some theoretical differences to the schemes as well. However, it is the practical considerations that make you go one or the other way. You will only learn those with experience but, if you can, coding a scheme will help tremendously. I strongly recommend reading the first four chapters from John Anderson's book on Computational Fluid Dynamics - The basics with applications.

*********************************************************
Are you new to this forum? If so, please read these FAQs:

http://www.eng-tips.com/faqs.cfm?fid=376
http://www.eng-tips.com/faqs.cfm?fid=1083

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources