Mixer - Can invert the spinning direction cause serious trouble?
Mixer - Can invert the spinning direction cause serious trouble?
(OP)
I have a reactor with a botton valve suffering with obstruction several times a week, thanks to some heavy solids in suspension depositing over it (excess of one reagent).
The mixer is a pitched turbine with four paddles that aparently forces the bulk of the mixture towards the bottom in the actual spinning direction.
I wish to invert this spinning direction, hoping to keep most of this solid particles in suspension by favoring an upwards axial flow. The reaction is very fast, and the mixing is actualy good. Also, there is no risk of unwanted parallel reactions.
Can this work?
Can i expect some heavy loss in agitation quality or in the worst case scenario i will have just an increased energy consumption?
I also thank for any hints, rules of thumb or materials on mixing issues.
The mixer is a pitched turbine with four paddles that aparently forces the bulk of the mixture towards the bottom in the actual spinning direction.
I wish to invert this spinning direction, hoping to keep most of this solid particles in suspension by favoring an upwards axial flow. The reaction is very fast, and the mixing is actualy good. Also, there is no risk of unwanted parallel reactions.
Can this work?
Can i expect some heavy loss in agitation quality or in the worst case scenario i will have just an increased energy consumption?
I also thank for any hints, rules of thumb or materials on mixing issues.





RE: Mixer - Can invert the spinning direction cause serious trouble?
Good luck,
Latexman
To a ChE, the glass is always full - 1/2 air and 1/2 water.
RE: Mixer - Can invert the spinning direction cause serious trouble?
See the paper:
http://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/12039904.pdf
RE: Mixer - Can invert the spinning direction cause serious trouble?
For now...let's try it out. Thanks guys.
RE: Mixer - Can invert the spinning direction cause serious trouble?
RE: Mixer - Can invert the spinning direction cause serious trouble?
However Google is your friend- search for upflow agitation
http://oatao.univ-toulouse.fr/1406/
https://books.google.com.au/books?id=LxdFnHQcXhgC&...
As a chem eng/metallurgist the first part of any answer I give starts with "It Depends"
RE: Mixer - Can invert the spinning direction cause serious trouble?
A single video is not representative of the world, so I'm not saying this is your problem, but . . . it's easy to test, right?
Good luck,
Latexman
To a ChE, the glass is always full - 1/2 air and 1/2 water.
RE: Mixer - Can invert the spinning direction cause serious trouble?
Your problem is deposits in the valve area. This is naturally a low shear area. You can try to increase flow there, but your problem is more likely that you are simply adding materials too quickly to the mixer.
Another option is a different draw-off valve that doesn't get plugged. There are ram-type plug valves that are flush with the inside of the mixer wall when closed. You could also recirculate through bottom valve back into the mixer during the mix, to keep the valve clear. An air operated diaphragm pump works well for this, as it is easy to connect.
RE: Mixer - Can invert the spinning direction cause serious trouble?
Mixers may generate foam and splash when mixing in the upward direction.
RE: Mixer - Can invert the spinning direction cause serious trouble?
This particular reactor dont have a frequency inverter, so i cant play with the agitation speeds.
I could put a larger pulley and increase the overal speed, but since the botton exit dont have a ram-type plug valve the shear will stay low on this particular area (there is a 10 cm neck on the botton before the valve).
There is some angle, paddle configuration or agitator type that could cause a higher shear directly under the end of the shaft?
RE: Mixer - Can invert the spinning direction cause serious trouble?
RE: Mixer - Can invert the spinning direction cause serious trouble?
Cutting and welding would be necessary to do a decent job there. This kind of intervention require a complete plant stop and descontamination. Since this reation is not a bottleneck, i intend to minimize the operational stress in a way that i could push it until January, when we have a maintenance stop scheduled and more agressive changes could be made (the ram-type valve is the best candidate). What i could do for now is change the pulleys (up to 20% more agitation speed, 100 rpm to 120 rpm), flow mode (downflow to upflow) or change the paddles. The temperature is also adjustable, but its already at its limit.
RE: Mixer - Can invert the spinning direction cause serious trouble?
RE: Mixer - Can invert the spinning direction cause serious trouble?
I like the idea of removing that flange. Welding a 45º paddle directly to the hub is already on the list o possible solutions.
But a 90° paddle has a radial flow pattern, so there is one more problem: the botton have a bushing to fix the end of the shaft, just over the exit line. An hydrofoil would not be a better attempt? It would be necessary a very vigorous axial downflow to keep the shear on the stagnant region under the bushing.
OBS.: the solid is KOH. It's heavy and goes straight to the botton.
OBS.2: I was able to make a quickfix to clear the plugging with a nitrogen nozzle pointing directly to the neck where the solids deposits. But the plugging itself is still a problem that i would like to get rid of.
RE: Mixer - Can invert the spinning direction cause serious trouble?
The rule of thumb is that the bottom mixer should be installed off the bottom a distance equal to the diameter of the mixer. From the image, the mixer looks to be much closer than that.
Also the baffles should not extend to the tank bottom, and be installed 4-6 inches off bottom.
[img https://books.google.com/books?id=N8RcH8juG_YC&...]
RE: Mixer - Can invert the spinning direction cause serious trouble?
This is a vessel that was adapted from another process a few years ago (i have just a few months of real working experience here). The agitation system wasnt developed for this specific function, since this was a simple pre-mix step. The soluble fraction dissolves readily; the insoluble dont mix at all.
Another shot: I have barelly 2 m of liquid, a second mixer on the shaft is not really necessary. Since the reaction itself is pretty fast and the problem is just the heavy solids, i think about changing the botton mixer for a simpler 45º paddles (without those screwed baffles) and remove the upper mixer; that, acording to some estimations, would allow me to almost double the stirring speed without increasing the power requirements to a level that could damage the bearing or the motor. This single mixer can be brought up to 0,6 m of the botton, obeying the Ludwigs's guideline (a mixer too close to the botton acts like a radial impeller).
RE: Mixer - Can invert the spinning direction cause serious trouble?
I have limited experience with mixer construction, but have operated several in painting, plastic and glue-producing industries.
Looking at the picture I imagine that with the short mixer-blades given, you will necessarily have a relatively high rotating speed.
The flow pattern in the tank, including the centrifugal force bringing the heavier particles to be sent in direction of the outer walls, will be dependent on how well the whole mass rotates and flow.
Could it be that even if the whole mass rotates, you have a heavier flow downstream near the axis than necessary, and a lesser rotation of the whole mass near the walls? This could be the reason that you do not have sufficient laminar stream at the bottom in the direction of the outer wall and then up to transport the heavier particles away from the center.
For all the mixers I have seen for fluid mixing with particles, the mixer blades have extended almost to the wall and rotated with a relatively slow movement.
In addition a slow-start/stop and speed control is a must for all mixers in my opinion.
RE: Mixer - Can invert the spinning direction cause serious trouble?
RE: Mixer - Can invert the spinning direction cause serious trouble?
(Only able to read the first picture/reference on my PC)
My additional question is even then that I cannot see how the total picture of flow in the tank, turbulent or partly laminar does not contribute to how the particles are distributed when you empty the tank. How is the procedure, stopping the mixing before drainage, or continuing or lower the rotation before emptying.
Anything to gain here in addition to alter the form of the mixer blades?
RE: Mixer - Can invert the spinning direction cause serious trouble?
Is there any carbonate in your water source? NaOH pellets have a nasty habit of fusing together if you add them too fast to a tank that isn't agitated sufficiently. Does the tank have a dished bottom (looks like it does). That will make it harder to suspend the solids.
If you're trying to suspend solids- high flow axial agitator blades will do a better job than the ones you have. Those blades are designed for high shear- not solids suspension.
As a chem eng/metallurgist the first part of any answer I give starts with "It Depends"
RE: Mixer - Can invert the spinning direction cause serious trouble?
Its a simple acid-base reaction prepared to cut some on the main reactors, but the solvent isnt water, its DMSO. The media becomes dense (1,3 kg/m³) and viscous (100cP+), especially if the heating is suspended and the mixture chill below 50°C (a common mistake, since the temperature rising above 100°C with KOH adition disable the heating loop, requiring manual override for security reasons).
Update: i found that some batches of KOH have scales about two times larger and thicker than the others. That explain why the plugging doesnt happens in every batch (batches with these KOH represents 90% of the pluging cases). Saddly, i still have this thing on deposit for two full production months, and a new shipment arriving on january.
Changing the paddles would take about two days for decontamination and confined space work protocols. This is scheduled for 12/27. For now, i've installed a 1/2" 1,5 kgf/cm² nitrogen line for bubbling the botton during the KOH load.
my guess is that decreasing the aparent density of the media with gas boubbles would increase the speed and shear on that region (yes, i love quickfixes). Seens to be working fine, but plugging still happen from time to time.
There is an advantage in using a propeller instead of an impeller? I mean, the mixing itself tends to be better with propeller, but impellers like marine paddles would not have an edge over propellers like a pitched blade turbines when coming to keep solids in suspension? As mentioned on above posts, i'm willing to sacrifice shear for axial flow, since most of the solids are readily soluble before saturation.
RE: Mixer - Can invert the spinning direction cause serious trouble?
Good luck,
Latexman
To a ChE, the glass is always full - 1/2 air and 1/2 water.
RE: Mixer - Can invert the spinning direction cause serious trouble?
If you see a positive reaction with adding gas bubbles, it could perhaps be interesting for you to have a further look into details.
Suggestions for check:
-Would it be easier, cheaper and possible to use air instead of nitrogen?
- With a correct balanced pressure and amount of gas you could experiment with a length of gas-dispersing holes in a pipe or host to add to the turbulence and direction/position of the gas outlet.
RE: Mixer - Can invert the spinning direction cause serious trouble?
Using air is out of question. DMSO is a very dangerous solvent (underestimated because of its widespread utilization), and we already experienced some frightening "almost-runaways" reactions with it at mild conditions.
About the holes, i'll check it out. Thanks.