×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Lofted Surfaces and datums referenced in FCF for Surface Profile

Lofted Surfaces and datums referenced in FCF for Surface Profile

Lofted Surfaces and datums referenced in FCF for Surface Profile

(OP)
I have seen some drawings for parts that have surface profile call outs of a lofted surface. The FCFs have profiles with no Datum references in the FCFs. It has been suggested that the datum references in the FCF of the profile are not required since, for surface profile of .020, the surface cannot be outside a +/-.010 zone from the nominal loft.
Profiles without a Datum reference only control form. Location, orientation and size are not controlled relative to the DRF without them. From a tolerance stack up perspective, most parts absolutely require that relation to the DRF.
Is there any way to reason that because a lofted, mathematically controlled surface never requires Datums to be referenced in the FCF? Please correct and/or comment and thanks.

RE: Lofted Surfaces and datums referenced in FCF for Surface Profile

No and no.

It is wrong that mathematically controlled surface never requires datum, and it is wrong not to use datums just because the part has mathematically controlled surface.

It is possible however that with SOME parts you can get away with that.

"For every expert there is an equal and opposite expert"
Arthur C. Clarke Profiles of the future

RE: Lofted Surfaces and datums referenced in FCF for Surface Profile

(OP)
Thank you much for the response.

RE: Lofted Surfaces and datums referenced in FCF for Surface Profile

RLD89,

I agree with CH. There is no relationship between mathematical control and datum feature references.

It is true that the surface cannot be outside a +/- .010 zone from the nominal loft. But without datum feature references nothing is constraining the part to the nominal loft, so location and orientation are not controlled. The only correction I would make is that surface profile is capable of controlling form and size (if the lofted feature has a "size" aspect).

Evan Janeshewski

Axymetrix Quality Engineering Inc.
www.axymetrix.ca

RE: Lofted Surfaces and datums referenced in FCF for Surface Profile

(OP)
Axym,
Thanks for the input. Profile of a surface does control location to the datums referenced. Correct?

RE: Lofted Surfaces and datums referenced in FCF for Surface Profile

Not necessarily.

Imagine "part" like the one on the enclosed picture.

Profile will control form, location, orientation and size - all without using datum(s).

So, like I said, SOMEtimes SOME things are possible, but they don't make the rule. (i like to play devil's advocate)

"For every expert there is an equal and opposite expert"
Arthur C. Clarke Profiles of the future

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources