×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Typical Moment Connection
2

Typical Moment Connection

Typical Moment Connection

(OP)
Hey everyone, just wondering if anyone has some thoughts/insight as to what type of moment connections are being commonly used in practice. I know a lot of it depends on seismic design considerations, fabrication cost, ease of erection, ect. I am just looking to get a feel for what people are using in their designs.

Thanks,
GD

RE: Typical Moment Connection

In order of economy, I'll use the following if it works:

1) Extended end plate moment connection.
2) All bolted flange/web plate moment connection.
3) Welded flange/web plate moment connection.

In all cases, I'll avoid having column continuity plates if possible. I may even up the column size to make it possible.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Typical Moment Connection

"Sideplate" is a proprietary system in the US that is gaining traction. Seems economical for BIG jobs. Also, they do the design and charge the fabricator. Thus, you save on the design side, albeit you have to have a comfort level with their engineers, etc. It's kind of a dual effort. I haven't worked with them, but thought I'd give you an "outside the box" answer since KootK is in the thread already. Trust KootK, he's a legend here...

RE: Typical Moment Connection

I think if you talk with engineers across the country or globe, you will get very different answers. Although, I agree with KootK on his list, I have found that contractors in my area prefer an all bolted or bolted/welded connection vs. extended end plates. This is because end plates can be more challenging to field erect if not enough tolerances have been left.

My best advice is to call one or several fabricators in your area or area of a particular project. There is a lot of value in talking with them ahead of designing your connections.

RE: Typical Moment Connection

Quote (BadgerPE)

This is because end plates can be more challenging to field erect if not enough tolerances have been left.

Can you elaborate on this? I've mostly only used them for small scale stuff where, I've assumed, the columns could be drawn together or pushed apart. I'm not sure what mechanisms would provide for tolerances in larger scaled applications. Fab short and shim?

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Typical Moment Connection

I have used them as well for small applications with only a few framelines. However, during preliminary design of a 3 story hospital addition, the contractor requested bolted web/welded flange connections for constructability in lieu of extended end plates. It sounded like they had an issue in the past where the beams came in right at dimension, but the columns were slightly off. So they had to have the beam refabricated to allow the columns to remain vertical. He said that if the same would have happened with a welded flange, they would have been able to grind the flanges back a little bit. Since the web bolt holes were slotted in the hz direction, it would have been a faster, cheaper field fix. This company sets a lot of structural steel so I have filed this little piece of information in the back of my brain for future use. Of course, this all goes away if the steel is set to plan.

RE: Typical Moment Connection

Thanks for that Badger. I can see how it could be a problem. If you really wanted to use extended end plate, I'd almost think that you'd need to design with 3/4" shims from the get go. Otherwise, you've got no way to deal with beams that are too long or columns that are too close together. I could also see it being a bit problematic to fish the beams into place unless top of beam is also top of column.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Typical Moment Connection

We always specify shims on our extended end plates. Sometimes they are used, sometimes not. We detail them out for full bearing but leave thickness up to contractor to match his means and methods. The contractors here in SoCal seem to expect them.

RE: Typical Moment Connection

(OP)
Thanks KootK, njlutzwe, BadgerPE, and BUGGAR. I appreciate the feedback.

-GD

RE: Typical Moment Connection

Sideplate saves alittle on the design side, not as much as you would think. Since they charge the contractor, treat them like a contractor, they are not an agent of the owner

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources