×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

P-Delta Effect ASCE 12.8.7

P-Delta Effect ASCE 12.8.7

P-Delta Effect ASCE 12.8.7

(OP)
I have a question regarding the application of ASCE 12.8.7. Equation (12.8-16) in ASCE 7-10 is as follows:


Theta = (Px) * Delta
----------------
Vx * hsx * Cd

Px = Total Vertical Design Load at and above level x
Delta = Story drift occurring simultaneously with Vx
Vx = Seismic Shear at level x
hsx = story height
Cd = deflection amplification factor

Calculation of Theta max is based on Equation (12.8-17):

Theta(max) = 0.5 / (Beta * Cd)

Beta = Ratio of Shear Demand to Shear Capacity for the story
ASCE also noted that theta should not exceed 0.1, which is around Theta(max)

Assuming Beta = 1.0 as permitted and Cd = 5.5, I have my Theta(max) = 0.091

I have the following sample of data from my coworker:

Level 30: P = 140 746 kN, V = 3758 kN, Delta = 6.653mm, h = 3200mm
Level 20: P = 257 772 kN, V = 4579 kN, Delta = 6.659mm, h = 3200mm

Plugging in these data, I get:
Level 30: Theta = 0.0142 < 0.091 [OK]
Level 20: Theta = 0.0213 < 0.091 [OK]

However, my coworker insists on following SEAOC Seismic Design Manual Example 17, where they ignored the Cd in calculating Theta getting the following results:
Level 30: Theta = 0.078 < 0.091 [OK]
Level 20: Theta = 0.117 < 0.091 [NG]

Why did we ignore the Cd value in SEAOC ?

RE: P-Delta Effect ASCE 12.8.7

I agree with your assessment. Are you looking at the 2012 manual? I have the 2006 manual in which this problem is #16 I think. And in that example, they do include Cd. So perhaps there has been a misprint.

Rationally, [V/[Delta * I / Cd]] is meant to represent the elastic, lateral spring stiffness of the story under consideration (kip/in). If Cd is ignored, that estimate would be off, by a lot. [Delta * I / Cd] needs to represent the elastic drift associated with the applied story shear.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: P-Delta Effect ASCE 12.8.7

P delta effects are based on deflection due to factored load, WITHOUT deflection amplification. It has never made complete sense to me, but that is what the Code says. In my mind, if you must have amplified deflection to relieve/reduce seismic load, wouldn't this mean the P delta increase should be based on vertical load times amplified deflection?

DaveAtkins

RE: P-Delta Effect ASCE 12.8.7

Quote (Dave)

In my mind, if you must have amplified deflection to relieve/reduce seismic load, wouldn't this mean the P delta increase should be based on vertical load times amplified deflection?

I think that I know the answer to this one. Keep in mind, however, that this is just based on my understanding of the fundamentals. I did't find it in a published code interpretation or anything like that.

Firstly, evaluating p-delta effects in the post-yielding range doesn't do much for us as there's really no mechanism available for resisting the additional moments. We really have to rely on the dynamic character of the motion to restore balance.

Contemporary seismic design procedures assume that, once the designer selects a system ductility level, the structure will remain elastic for a certain portion of its load history and be plastic-ish for the remainder. If p-delta effects in the elastic range are significant, then the duration of the elastic load history will be shortened and important assumptions will start getting messed up.

I believe that this is why the ASCE provision assess P-delta magnification using elastic drift response. The antidotes to P-delta effects shortening the duration of elastic response are:

1) verify that the p-delta effect is small enough to be of little consequence or:
2) strengthen the structure in response to p-delta amplification to effectively extend the duration of elastic response.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: P-Delta Effect ASCE 12.8.7

Eq 12.8-15: Delta = Cd * deflection / I
Eq 12.8-16: Theta = (Px * Delta) / (Vx * Hsx * Cd)

Therefore: Theta = (Px * deflection) / (Vx * Hsx)

In summary, Use Delta and Cd, but understand that this is actually excluding Cd.

RE: P-Delta Effect ASCE 12.8.7

Not sure how this compares to the manual assessment, but if you use direct analysis (using STAAD for instance) this automatically includes for p-delta response.

RE: P-Delta Effect ASCE 12.8.7

rogerheadford,

True--and many engineers do include P-Delta in the analysis, since the software does it for you. The theta factor in ASCE 7 is just a means of deciding if it MUST be included, or if it can be ignored.

DaveAtkins

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources