×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Field and Laboratory Tests on "GC"

Field and Laboratory Tests on "GC"

Field and Laboratory Tests on "GC"

(OP)
Comments on the most suitable and practical tests (both field and laboratory) to investigate the mechanical properties of clayey gravels is appreciated.
It is usually very hard to trim the samples for triaxial (if suitable shellby or corebarrel sample could be collected),for many cases also the trx tests have not shown suitable results due to the existance of carse-grained gravel,....
The main purpose of the question is the consolidation settlement of the layer.
I do not mean the large scale insitu direct shear test or the long term large scale plate bearing test ( say, on RC pads).

Regards
cmorgh

RE: Field and Laboratory Tests on "GC"

cmorgh:

Gravel always complicates things in the lab. What we do is run a gradation to find out how big and how much of the big stuff we have. We then batch the sample and remold. What I mean by batching is to fabricate the sample to the exact gradation of the as received material. If we run 6" diameter samples we will batch each two inch lift. We fabricate each lift to the exact gradation needed, add the exact amount of water needed and put it in a bag to cure. We put together 6 bags then remold the sample in two inch lifts. Some labs would use smaller lifts but remember we are working with a 12" tall sample that is going to weigh about 30 pounds. Gravel doesn't really have a structure so I think remolding a large sample to the same gradation and M&D is OK. We get very good results with the large scale samples. As far as consolidation you could run Ko on a triaxial size sample and the gravel would not affect the results nearly as much as a typical 1x3" sample in an incremental or CRS consol. When ever we get a request for a direct shear test and it turns out to be a gravel everything stops and the client is called and it always turns out to be an expensive and time consuming testing program. Another approach is to scalp on the #4 sieve and test the matrix. It is a very conservative approach and saves allot of time and money. It is not the preferred method.

Good Luck,

Dirtdoc1

RE: Field and Laboratory Tests on "GC"

cmorgh:

I forgot to mention that there are 6" diameter shelby or pither tubes if you have to have undisturbed samples. We have those come in the door but usually just on litigation testing jobs with lawyers from both sides watching every move we make. I finally figured out how to get rid of them. Charge $100 per hour per person and they run for the hills.

Best Regards,

Dirtdoc1

RE: Field and Laboratory Tests on "GC"

Give us some specifics on the samples: in situ UDW, percent gravel by weight, PL, WC, LL, GS of the clay.

RE: Field and Laboratory Tests on "GC"

(OP)
Dear dirtdoc1,
Thank you very much for your comments. Remoulding samples for investigating such a texture is also performed by me, but the point is that not very suitable answers are usually got, i.e. rather scattered ones which are not always due to the remoulding process.
Let me know please, the way you usually judge about the suitability of the results, being compared with the actual undisturbed characteristics of such a soil, being located underground?
However I myself (and usually) have to use this method, aswell.
Thank you again for your care
Regards (and apologize for delay- Busy with site work)
cmorgh

RE: Field and Laboratory Tests on "GC"

(OP)
Dear Focht 3,
I will send the parameters requested, as soon as possible. I hereby apologize for delay.

Regards
cmorgh

RE: Field and Laboratory Tests on "GC"

cmorgh:

Remolding samples are never the best or representative approach. If you are working with granular materials that don't really have a structure then remolding to the same moisture and density may be usefull. You have to be sure to make the diameter of your remolded sample at least 6 times the largest particle size. You will need to run a gradation and fabricate your sample to that same gradation. If there is a structure to the material then undisturbed samples are your best bet. I'm sorry but I can't give you any more than that.

Best Regards,

Dirtdoc1

RE: Field and Laboratory Tests on "GC"

(OP)
Dear Dirtdoc1

Thank you very much for your valuable comments. You have been very helpful to me.

Regards
Cmorgh

RE: Field and Laboratory Tests on "GC"

Dirtdoc1 is right on target rregarding the testing.  But keep in mind that you may not be able to perform consolidation tests on gravelly clays that give you any meaningful results.  You may be forced to use correlations oc CC with the clay's liquid limit, then reduce the settlement estimate based on the volume occupied by the gravel.  It's crude, but it may be your only viable option.

Two other possible options: hand carve "gravel free" samples for consolidation testing, then apply the "gravel correction."  Or use SHANSEP to evaluate the clay fraction, then reduce settlement based on the gravel content.

Let us know what you decide to do -

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources