×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Wall Brace Buckling

Wall Brace Buckling

Wall Brace Buckling

(OP)
Want to make sure I'm going about this correctly.
I have a wall leaning at angle 'phi' at a weight of 25,000#. I'd like to put a bracing column up to support it at angle 'theta'. The brace will be welded to the wall and then bolted into the concrete through a baseplate. I was going to design my column for buckling and my bolts and baseplate weld for shear. Wanted to see if my forces were correct. Thanks in advance.

RE: Wall Brace Buckling

Doesn't look right to me.
A = Bottom of wall, B = top of wall
C = Bottom of brace, D = top of brace (and intersection with AB)
E is below D on ground level
F is point on CD which is nearest point A (i.e. AFC is a right angle)

height of wall AB = h
brace length = b
weight of wall = W

Overturning Moment (OTM) about A = (Wh/2)sin(phi)
Height DE = b.sin(theta)
AE = b.sin(theta)tan(phi)
EC = b.cos(theta)
AC = AE + EC = b[cos(theta) + sin(theta).tan(phi)]
AF = AC sin(theta) = b.sin(theta)[(cos(theta) + sin(theta).tan(phi)]

Brace force F = OTM/AF = (Wh/2(sin(phi)/b.sin(theta)[(cos(theta) + sin(theta).tan(phi)]


For some reason, I couldn't get the Extended characters to work properly so I wrote the Greek letters as text.




BA

RE: Wall Brace Buckling

If you want to include wind on the wall, add w.h^2/2 to the OTM.

w is the uniform wind load on the wall

BA

RE: Wall Brace Buckling

Doesn't look right to me.
A = Bottom of wall, B = top of wall
C = Bottom of brace, D = top of brace (and intersection with AB)
E is below D on ground level
F is point on CD which is nearest point A (i.e. AFC is a right angle)

height of wall AB = h
brace length = b
weight of wall = W

Re-writing using T for theta and P for phi:
Overturning Moment (OTM) about A = (Wh/2)sinP
Height DE = b.sinT
AE = b.sinT.tanP
EC = b.cosT
AC = AE + EC = b(cosT + sinT.tanP)
AF = AC sinT = b.sinT(cosT + sinT.tanP)

Brace force F = OTM/AF = (Wh/2)sinP/b.sinT(cosT + sinT.tanP)

BA

RE: Wall Brace Buckling

I'll offer a graphical approach to the problem for review, see the attached marked up sketch:

WT acts through the wall's center of gravity, not necessarily the attachment point for the brace.
Sum moments about the wall's base to get the magnitude of R. Of course, R is perpendicular to the wall.
FC has to act along the length of the brace.
V keeps the brace from sliding.
The trigonometry to get the answer should be straightforward.

www.SlideRuleEra.net idea
www.VacuumTubeEra.net r2d2

RE: Wall Brace Buckling

Something amiss there, SRE. Your vectors do not look quite right.

BA

RE: Wall Brace Buckling

If the distance between A and C in the attached diagram is specified, reactions at A and C can easily be found. The load W is 1 unit from A and 4 units from C so the vertical reactions are 0.8W and 0.2W at A and C respectively.

so Fc = Vc/sinT
and Hc = Vc/tanT
and Ha = Hc (not true if wind is included)

BA

RE: Wall Brace Buckling

Thanks, BA, that helps a lot.
Do believe that I have gotten the vector's corrected (see attached file).
R remains perpendicular to the wall.
FC continues to act along the length of the brace.
A new vector, called M, acts along the height of the wall. If the OP is designing a real brace, the value of M is the sliding force the connection between the brace and the wall has to resist.

As a check of my diagram, I printed your drawing, computed the angles, and scaled the lengths. After a lot of trigonometry, got the same reactions and other values you do.

www.SlideRuleEra.net idea
www.VacuumTubeEra.net r2d2

RE: Wall Brace Buckling

SlideRuleEra,
I can see how the vectors M and R relate to Fc. Is the force Fc found graphically from the Wc vector? Offhand, I can't see how that could be done.

In any case, there is not enough information given by the OP to solve the problem. Without specifying a few additional parameters such as wall height and brace length, there are infinitely many answers.

BA

RE: Wall Brace Buckling

(OP)
Thanks guys, very helpful and much appreciated.

Here's a little bit more info and my numbers.

W: 30,000#
AC: 22ft
DC: 36ft
AB: 67ft
AD: 33.5ft
T: arccos[(DC^2-AD^2+AC^2)/(2.DC.AC)] = arccos[(36^2-33.5^2+22^2)/(2.36.22)] = 65.47*
DE: DCsin(T) = 32.75ft
P: arccos(DE/AD) = arccos(32.75/33.5) = 12.15*
AF: ACsin(T) = 22sin(65.47) = 20ft
OTM: (W(AB)/2)sin(P) = (30(67)/2)sin(12.15) = 221.5k-ft
Fc: OTM/AF = 221.5/20 = 11kips

I am a little confused at how you got Fc. I'm not sure how AF factors in.

Thanks again.

RE: Wall Brace Buckling

BA - Yes, I did calculate FC using a semigraphical solution. Did sneak in a method from my Mechanical Engineering background (Kinematics and Dynamics of Machinery). Recognized that the problem has an exact ME analog - a slider-crank mechanism:



For reference, I have attached the marked up working copy of your helpful sketch. The letters below are from your sketch, not the above image.

Calculated the angles using your block gird. Phi = 26.6 degrees, Theta = 40.6 degrees.

Using a scale, measured the dimensions for the "wall":
Wall height (AB) = 11 units
Center of Gravity = 5.50 units.
Location of Brace (AD) = 8.30 units.

I considered point A to be an "instant center of rotation". Temporarily ignored DC and replaced it with vector R, perpendicular to the wall. Summed moments about A to solve for R.

After that, it was pretty much "plug and chug" using geometry and trigonometry. Got answers accurate to about 0.6%+, compared to your exact solution... not to bad for a semigraphical approach. BTW, I am not recommending the above way of solving the problem (with the possible exception of determining M). Just wanted to see if I could do it. Your elegant solution is much better.

www.SlideRuleEra.net idea
www.VacuumTubeEra.net r2d2

RE: Wall Brace Buckling

Quote (OP)

OTM: (W(AB)/2)sin(P) = (30(67)/2)sin(12.15) = 221.5k-ft
Fc: OTM/AF = 221.5/20 = 11kips

I am a little confused at how you got Fc. I'm not sure how AF factors in.

OTM = 211.5 foot-kips
Fc = OTM/AF = 10.6 kips

Fc is the axial force in the brace. It has a moment about point A of Fc.AF which must be equal to the overturning moment about A.

When you consider only vertical load, it may be easier to calculate Fc from the reaction at C but if you want to add wind perpendicular to the wall, it is easier to use OTM/AF.

Assume there is a wind pressure of w acting normal to the wall in the sloped position. Then OTM(wind) = wL2/2 where L is 67 feet. So the brace force due to wind is wL2/(2*20) = 112.2w.

If braces are spaced 10 feet apart and wind pressure is 20 psf, w = 200#/'
So Fc from wind alone is 22,445# or 22.5k, substantially more than the force due to the dead load of the wall.

Another point to consider is the strength and deformation of the wall. It has a cantilever length of 33.5'. Are you sure you want to attach the brace at mid-height of the wall?

BA

RE: Wall Brace Buckling

SlideRuleEra,
I got used to solving trusses using the graphical method when I started in Toronto in 1955. The plan checkers at that time insisted on a force vector diagram for each truss to be included on the drawings. It was a good way of solving for member forces and the accuracy was plenty good enough for engineering purposes.

Even now, when I want a quick and dirty solution to a problem, I scratch out a vector diagram on whatever is available and measure the length of the resulting vectors.

BA

RE: Wall Brace Buckling

(OP)
BA, thanks for the explanation. Also, I just looked at my calcs and did get the 211.5 for OTM and accidentally wrote down 221.5. No biggie though.

As far as the cantilever goes, the "wall" is technically a bowed out banana shaped wall. The peak of the bow is right about h/2 and is connected at the base and the top of h. I was assuming a fully leaning wall as a worst case scenario and after running the calcs had more than enough built into my section.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources