×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Site classification why not correct SPT

Site classification why not correct SPT

Site classification why not correct SPT

(OP)
The procedures in ASCE 7 for site classification says "Ni is the standard penetration resistance ... Without corrections".

Not using corrections just don't make sense to me. Any one ever thought about this?

Thanks.

RE: Site classification why not correct SPT

If you have ever spent time with test boring crews, you will understand how crude the test is. In the old days with rope and cat-head, all sorts of problems can occur. With mechanical hammers, lubrication is an issue. How about inertia in a string of rods? Then, some day take a look at the split spoons. Buggered up ends are possible. All this will tell you that precision just is not there. If you want to work to a few decimal points with N values, go ahead. Not me.

RE: Site classification why not correct SPT

(OP)
I agree with you that SPT is a very crude test. However, SPT correction has been used everywhere else to correlate to density, strength parameters, etc. Why not Site Class?

RE: Site classification why not correct SPT

The energy correction should be applied for site class (N60), but not overburden, rod length, and others.

RE: Site classification why not correct SPT

seed and idriss correlations for liquifaction are based on corrected N-values. I am not familar with the cited method and rarely do such work. Just saying, the source of n-value correlations uses corrections.

f-d

ípapß gordo ainÆt no madre flaca!

RE: Site classification why not correct SPT

Agree with moe...N60. If you are thinking there should be a bump in site class, move toward shear wave velocity assessment. The SPT approach was built in conservative for many of the reasons mentioned here. If N60ave is better than about 30bpf, there is a good chance the shear wave velocity will get you to a C but depending on geology and what you're beating the pipe (ie. Spoon) through along with who is doing the spoon driving and type of hammer.

RE: Site classification why not correct SPT

I think that the use of SPT N-values (corrected or not) for site classification purposes, will limit the site class to "D". For example, if you want to classify the site as "C" you will need an average SPT N-value of more than 50 for the top 100 feet (30 meters) of soils, which is rarely encountered. If there are cost savings when classifying the site better than "D" and knowing that your geology may allow it, perhaps a shear wave velocity method to classify the site is more appropriate.

RE: Site classification why not correct SPT

A site class C is quite common using SPT data in Southern California

RE: Site classification why not correct SPT

moe, I am assuming that your bedrock is located at shallow locations in your area, so you can get class C using SPT.

RE: Site classification why not correct SPT

Dense/very dense alluvium or "soft" sedimentary "rock"

RE: Site classification why not correct SPT

its not a good idea using SPT on soft rocks . These materials have their own behavior which deviate from the well known soil behavior or the rock mechanics , be very careful about what you are doing

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources