×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Foundation for Machinery

Foundation for Machinery

Foundation for Machinery

(OP)
There is an empirical rule that the weight(mass) of the foundation needs to be 3 times the machinery (API). How should the weight be calculated? Is it below grade only? If so is there any clarification any write up or commentary any where.

RE: Foundation for Machinery

Usually the dynamics of the machine control. If it has much imbalance, a massive foundation may be needed. If none, maybe just the floor slab. Weight controls then.

RE: Foundation for Machinery

It is my understanding that the following references the book that best covers machinery foundation design.

http://www.amazon.com/Design-Structures-Foundation...

Also, it should be remembered that the machinery vendor clearly bears some responsibility in the foundation design details.

Competent and first class pump vendors, such as Goulds and Flowsereve provide detailed requirements in their O&M manuals.

Whereas in the third world, there exists an active market in used equipment, there will always be a problem because all documentation has been usually thrown away by the previous machinery owner. This, of course, makes things extra difficult for the hapless newly graduated engineer who is assigned the foundation design for the used equipment.

The distinction must be understood between "reciprocating" equipment (which generates high and harmonic vibration) and smooth running "centrifugal" types of equipment

MJCronin
Sr. Process Engineer

RE: Foundation for Machinery

ACI 351 might be useful to you. Logically, I can't think of any reason why effective mass should be limited to mass below grade. The mass will effect the K/m ratio whether it's above grade or below.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Foundation for Machinery

Mass embedded in the ground is no different from mass above ground as far as sqrt(K/M) effects go.  Its particular benefit comes from the additional damping it usually offers, by engaging "radiation damping" in the soil.  This can be useful if you are getting a bit close to resonance.

RE: Foundation for Machinery

When composing my post above I forgot to add a strong endorsement of the reference book MJCronin is suggesting ("Design of Structures and Foundations for Vibrating Machines" by S.Arya, M.O'Neill & G.Pincus).  You won't find better.

For vibrating machines on a rigid concrete pad footing, the book's Table 6.2 contains a step-by-step method of analysis.  I have written a spreadsheet implementing this method, downloadable from my website (rmniall.com).

RE: Foundation for Machinery

The response of the structure to dynamic loads depends mass and stiffness of the structural system.
Ideally since the soil is also a part of system, it's mass would also play a part, but it is convenient to ignore it due to it's minor stiffness.

coming back to your question, the mass of the footing both above and below the grade should be considered.

RE: Foundation for Machinery

I would point you towards ACI 351 as the most practical reference. Really probably the best place to begin. It focuses mostly on exactly what is done in engineering practice. Then it points back towards other sources for references for the theory behind the methods presented.

I've got nothing against the S.Arya, M.O'Neill & G.Pincus book. It is a fine reference as well. And, anyone who wants to become an expert on this subject will want this as a part of their library. But, it's more theoretical than practical. As such, it may be a bit intimidating to someone who isn't already well versed in the subject.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources