×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

WRC-297 STATUS

WRC-297 STATUS

WRC-297 STATUS

(OP)
PREVIOUS THREAD REFERENCE: thread794-318482: WRC BULLETIN 537 Errata

My question is did WRC-537 include the findings from WRC-297? or was WRC-537 just a better quality print of WRC-107?

RE: WRC-297 STATUS

537 was just 107 with digitized curves. No technical were made.

RE: WRC-297 STATUS

(OP)
Thanks TGS4. If that is the case, we are planning to purchase a new copy of WRC-537 soon, but should be still fine to do calculations based on WRC-107. Its a shame that they didn't incorporate WRC-297 to WRC-537 issue.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources