×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Force required to dimple metal with sharp tip
3

Force required to dimple metal with sharp tip

Force required to dimple metal with sharp tip

(OP)
What formula or method would you use to determine the force required to push the sharpened tip of a round shaft a certain distance into a very thick piece of metal (magnesium in my case, but I assume the formula would be the same using the proper E or Fy or something for whatever material)? To be specific, I want to push a sharpened steel shaft (45° point) 1/2" into a piece of magnesium that is 30" thick and 18" x 18" square. How do I calculate the axial force required to do that?

RE: Force required to dimple metal with sharp tip

Your load case is essentially plane strain indentation. For a flat punch onto a flat surface, the applied pressure would need to be 3 times the material yield strength. For your case with a pointed indenter, the applied pressure would be lower, but probably not that much lower. How accurate do you need to be?

RE: Force required to dimple metal with sharp tip

(OP)
The shaft diameter is 2.25" and I am only trying to push the tip in about 5/8", so it is still on the angled portion of the sharpened tip, not on the full diameter of the shaft. As far as accuracy, I would like it to be accurate to within a couple thousand pounds of axial force. I just assumed there was some theoretical equation that I could use, but maybe not?

I am a structural guy so for steel there are bearing calculations that are essentially 1.8 x Fy x Bearing Area to theoretical failure (which is quite a bit less than the 3xFy stated above by CoryPad), but it doesn't seem quite right to call this a bearing surface area failure.

RE: Force required to dimple metal with sharp tip

is there a reason why you don't want to cut a CSK/dimple ? Plastically forming the dimple would require yielding a lot more material than just the cross-section of the shaft.

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: Force required to dimple metal with sharp tip

(OP)
The pointed shaft is part of a lifting rig where the shaft presses into a large 10,000 lb magnesium log and lifts it. So a crane drops the lifting rig over the magnesium log and the shaft is pressed into the side of the log on each side and then the crane lifts the log. I appreciate the help, but try not to get distracted by trying to solve a problem with a number of other solutions. I have a solution that works, but am trying to figure out the mechanics behind it with engineering principles. The shaft is threaded and is turned through a fixed nut, which presses the tip into the magnesium. I want to figure out if I can use a smaller shaft, but I don't know how to calculate the force required to make the dimple. I know the torque required to turn the shaft and using some assumptions on friction I can back calculate the axial force, but I don't know if my assumptions on friction are accurate enough to base a design on. So I thought I would start from scratch and see of I could calculate what the force needs to be. But it turns out that I don't know how to do that so I thought I would ask the good mechanical engineers on this site. If you have any insight on how I could do that, I would appreciate it. Thanks.

RE: Force required to dimple metal with sharp tip

you want to rotate the shaft ? why not use something like a Really big Phillip's head screw driver ? force to embed into the "log" would be much lower.

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: Force required to dimple metal with sharp tip

(OP)
MintJulep, that was exactly what I was looking for. Thank you!

RE: Force required to dimple metal with sharp tip

(OP)
Hmm, after working through the math, something does not seem right. We get a depth of penetration of about 5/8" with a force (back-calculated from torque) of about 113,000 lbs. Per the equations on the wikipedia page and another reference I found once I knew what to look for, I calculate that for 5/8" penetration, I would need a force of 1,700,000 lbs. My force number back-calculated from torque might be off by a factor of as much as 2, but not more than 10, which these equations suggest. My shaft couldn't handle that much force to begin with. Is it known that these theoretical equations don't match real life by a factor of 10?

RE: Force required to dimple metal with sharp tip

"a force (back-calculated from torque)" ... ?

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: Force required to dimple metal with sharp tip

How are you driving the shaft now, and how accurately do you think you are determining the torque you think you are applying? Hydraulic force twisting a threaded rod?

You are driving a cone into the large diameter "log" so the initial penetration starts with a near-zero-area point touching a near-zero area tangent wall on the side of the log. Then, as this point goes in, the contact area increases as two things happen: Unlike a shear punch through a flat metal, the contact area increases proportional as all three of the depth of the cone AND the angle of the cone AND the depth of the side of the log increase, while the shear force of the flat metal remains the same all of the time as the diameter of the punch.

So I expect your initial pressure and initial torque to be very low, and initial penetration depth starts very low then increases to some "stall point".

RE: Force required to dimple metal with sharp tip

Reading mintjulep's link, it appears the formula provided will only apply up to the elastic limit of the Mg. Beyond that, the effective modulus will drop significantly. That probably accounts for the difference since in your case, most of the penetration will be in the plastic region.

je suis charlie

RE: Force required to dimple metal with sharp tip

It has got to be into the plastic region - actually, well past the local plastic yield since both of the tips of the probes go into the "log" a "long way" on both sides.

RE: Force required to dimple metal with sharp tip

(OP)
OK, so to clarify some things. The log of magnesium is rectangular, not round, so the point goes into a flat face. And the shaft is more like a bolt. It is threaded with a nut welded on the end. The shaft/bolt is driven by an air impact wrench with a multiplier that allows more torque to be applied than the air gun itself can give. A guy is standing there operating the impact wrench, which is turning the shaft/bolt through a threaded fixed plate into the magnesium log. There is a simple equation that can be used to convert torque applied to a bolt into the axial force on the bolt. I don't consider the equation very accurate because it relies on a coefficient of friction between the bolt and the nut, which has been shown to vary, but in ideal conditions, it has been tested and shown to be accurate. The formula is T = c x F x d, where T=torque, c = the friction coefficient, F = the axial force, and d = the diameter of the bolt (https://www.engineersedge.com/torque.htm).

In the end, I still think that all of that information (except maybe the flat face bit) is not required to answer the question, if there is an answer. It doesn't matter why I want to do it this way or how the shaft is driven, I just want to know if there is an equation that describes the normal force required to drive a shaft into a material. MintJulep gave a good resource, but as others have clarified, it only works in the elastic range. Does anyone have a reference for an equation in the plastic region?

RE: Force required to dimple metal with sharp tip

I think there's a significant difference between driving an impactor into a body and screwing a pointy shaft into a body.

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: Force required to dimple metal with sharp tip

(OP)
Ok rb1957, in what significant way will it change the equation? In the end isn't it still just a normal force pushing a rod into a material? In my case the rod might be rotating while it is being pushed in, but I don't see how that changes things significantly. But I am willing to be taught if you have something meaningful to say.

RE: Force required to dimple metal with sharp tip

Shaneelliss:
NO... How’s that for an answer without any questions or discussion?

If you don’t want to discuss your problem, we don’t really give a damn what you do, or why, or how. There is a lot of engineering knowledge and experience here on E-Tips, and many people more than willing to waste their time on you problem and to try to be of help. But, with your attitude, who cares. I just deleted the page of thoughts and comments I had started for you to consider, since I don’t have a quick formula.

RE: Force required to dimple metal with sharp tip

I don't believe there is a simple formula that will get you there, though you may get close using your experimental data and the equations shown in the opening paragraphs of this:

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S...

RE: Force required to dimple metal with sharp tip

(again) I think there's a significant difference between driving an impactor into a body using axial force and screwing a pointy shaft into a body. Surely you can see that how the metal will flow is completely different. No, I don't have a simple equation for you and would suggest testing; and I not willing to invest much more thought into the problem. If you don't like my replies, you could try to "red flag" me and complain to the mgmt.

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: Force required to dimple metal with sharp tip

(OP)
Yikes, dhengr, I guess I have come across as a jerk. I apologize for that. It wasn't my intention. I enjoy the discussion, but I feel like a lot of times the details distract people from the question, so I was trying to get back to that. I have read your responses to other people's questions over the years and have come to respect your experience and knowledge, so I am a little bummed that you deleted a page of thoughts and comments that I am sure I would have liked to read.

RE: Force required to dimple metal with sharp tip

I expect that the force to indent as described would depend highly on the square of the depth of the indentation. I'm just going by the area of the anvil interacting. Maybe in the form of (Depth ^2) * some constant * SY.

As an experiment, you might try using a cutting tip, like the end of a big drill, instead of your 45 degree anvil. It might be a lot easier to drive it. You might have to experiment with the pitch of the driving thread. As a SWAG, maybe use a 3/4"-16 thread? Maybe use a ball screw to minimize driving force as well.

Maybe use a 3/4-16 rod with an adaptor, threaded at one and and a socket for a 5/8 or 3/4 stubby drill at the other. Drive the same, back it out, and snug a bolt into the new hole.

RE: Force required to dimple metal with sharp tip

shaneelliss

I would caution you against making assumptions about what is, or isn't, a critical detail. Often, there are trivial constraints that could have monumental effects, had someone been made aware of them.

To wit, the fact that the shaft is turning raises issues not only about friction, but also the possibility of galling. While magnesium is supposedly "resistant" to galling, applying that much pressure to it could change the dynamic.

TTFN
I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert!
homework forum: //www.engineering.com/AskForum/aff/32.aspx
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers

RE: Force required to dimple metal with sharp tip

Btrueblood linked to an article dealing with conical indentation related to hardness testing (Rockwell method with Brale indenter). The equations in this and similar articles provide high accuracy for small indents, but I am not sure they scale to your sizes. I think you will find my simple equation is a good starting point and physical testing would be needed to refine the value.

RE: Force required to dimple metal with sharp tip

I would try an energy method - look at the problem as one of breaking the crystals in the metal. In that view it is displacing at least the volume of penetration, from which one could determine the amount of energy to nearly liquefy a similar volume of metal.

Sensibly, if the material is already near the melting point, the force required lessens.

At each increment in depth there will be a volume of material intersected by the cone, so divide the energy required for that incremental amount by the distance required to get the force required for that increment. Since the volume incrementally displaced is the cube of the depth, the forces should be increasing at least as the cube of the depth with some factor for increasing friction; simple enough to test with a small setup and more limited depths.

The inaccuracy to this is that it doesn't account for residual strength in the displace material, and it doesn't include material outside the cone volume that is also displaced. It also avoids the contribution of elastic deformation outside the plastic zone and the friction between the cone and the material being displaced. Accounting for torque applied and thread friction is a separate issue.

I don't imagine the amounts from these contributors are equal to the initial volumetric displacement, so doubling the values from melting should be representative.

Altogether I would not expect a simple formula.

I would probably pre-drill the indentation, although since similar amounts of material are displaced, one could look at the power absorbed during the process to also make an estimate similar to melting the material.

RE: Force required to dimple metal with sharp tip

I very specifically do not think you can scale-up from a single pin-tip (rockwell hardness type imprint) to a deep conic imprint into a flat plate. Even a shear energy comparison is wrong (or at least inaccurate) because a shear force cuts a ring through a constant distance around the shear in the limited area of the base metal between the shear and the die. It really is only that metal in the ring that is displaced.

In this case, the volume of the cone is pushed INTO the base metal around the cone (no metal is removed at all) and so the plasticized volume is 2x the conic volume. First you have to displace the base metal from the cone, then you have to push it through the base metal that surrounds the final cone.

RE: Force required to dimple metal with sharp tip

3DDave, there is no need to refer to melting, the process would be solid-state, so plasticity and strain energy/work would be used.

racookpe1978, for indentation, the metal would flow in the opposite direction of the cone, up the sides of the indenter and create a "pile up" on the surface around the indenter.

RE: Force required to dimple metal with sharp tip

(OP)
I was misinformed slightly about the procedure they were using to drive the screw. They don't use an impact wrench, they just turn the bolt with a ratchet and a multiplier. There are two pointed tips. One is stationary on the opposite face of the material from the turning screw and then the pointed tip of the turning screw itself. So turning the screw with a ratchet applies compression and both tips sink into the material on opposite sides.

I went out and we tested the torque it would take to drive the point in and found that the turning tip embeds slightly further than the fixed tip on the opposite side. A 5/8" embedment of the turning tip (which embedded the fixed tip about 9/16") required 925 ft-lbs of torque. We got the same results with four tests. We didn't have any way to test for a smaller indentation because the torque wrench we had had a minimum setting of 50 ft-lbs and our torque multiplier was 18.5:1. So we basically just torqued it until we hit the minimum 50 lbs of torque on the torque wrench (which using the multiplier was 925 ft-lbs) and that gave us the 5/8" embedment. This was quite a bit less than was reported to me originally but they said they were going off memory from doing this several years ago, so they probably just remembered wrong.

I wanted to keep playing with it for science, but the plant operations guys said they had better things to do so the experiment was ended. I can't get any of the mathematical models I tried to match the experimental results. The closest I got was about 4x more than the experimental results with a model based on delta = PL/AE. But I didn't feel like that was the model I would have expected to be the most accurate. Oh well, time to move on to something more productive I guess.

RE: Force required to dimple metal with sharp tip

What yield strength were you using for the magnesium? A log of that size likely is as-cast, with low strength, probably lower than 100 MPa (15 ksi).

RE: Force required to dimple metal with sharp tip

(OP)
The log is coming directly off a casting machine when I pick it up. I used 18 ksi in my calcs.

RE: Force required to dimple metal with sharp tip

I notice that the conversation seems to have returned to the impactor type of story (like a Charpy test) we started with. But the OP has stated that the cone tip is torqued, rotated, into the log. This is surely a completely different type of story, no? and may explain why one bit beds in more than the other (one's turning and the other isn't, no?).

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: Force required to dimple metal with sharp tip

I agree that rotation of the tip is a completely different situation than simple penetration. Rotation will cause plastic shear flow of the material in contact with the tip. Once it is flowing due to shear it will flow in the direct of any pressure gradient with little or no additional energy input. The pressure gradient in this case is from the tip of the penetrator to the surface of the ingot, where pressure is zero (15 psia).

RE: Force required to dimple metal with sharp tip

The OP has told us that only one of the two indenters is rotated. He therefore has a direct indication of how much difference the rotation makes. One would suspect that the rotated indenter will penetrate slightly more, however the non-rotated indenter can be be used to verify whatever theory is used to model this somewhat simpler situation.

je suis charlie

RE: Force required to dimple metal with sharp tip

A lower bound estimate of the work to remove the conical plug is the yield stress times the area of the cone times say a quarter of the diameter of the cone. How does that stack up with your other estimates? Also bear in mind you are creating two conical holes, not one, with just one screw.

I am amazed at the small difference turning vs plunge.

Cheers

Greg Locock


New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?

RE: Force required to dimple metal with sharp tip

This topic is similar to bolted joints. It is desirable to avoid indenting clamped parts with screws and nuts. The allowable pressure is higher for a stationary fastener (which provides compression only) compared with a rotating fastener (compression plus shear).

RE: Force required to dimple metal with sharp tip

After reading back thru the posts I did not see any mention of what the diameter of the penetrator is. It was noted that the penetrator cone has a 45deg included angle and a "sharp" tip. But in theory, if the steel penetrator had a very sharp point and a very small diameter it would not require much force to penetrate 5/8" into the magnesium surface. As long as the steel penetrator has sufficient diameter to prevent buckling from the compressive load and unsupported length.

RE: Force required to dimple metal with sharp tip

from back on the 17th ...
from the OP ... "The shaft diameter is 2.25" and I am only trying to push the tip in about 5/8", ..."

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources