×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Flat Heads and UG-34

Flat Heads and UG-34

Flat Heads and UG-34

(OP)
We are designing an assembly subject to internal pressure that will use a circular flat head that is retaining mechanically at the outer diameter (Fig UG-34(m)). The head must meet Sec VIII Div 1. Is the Equation 't = d*sqrt(CP/SE)' only applicable to the plate center where maximum bending occurs, or does this minimum required thickness have to carry all the way to the plate periphery?

RE: Flat Heads and UG-34

That equation, from my understanding, applies to flat heads with uniform thickness (or assumed uniform thickness, i.e. ignoring raised faces, etc.).

The resulting minimum thickness should carry along the periphery.

When you have varying thickness, the stress distribution will be different, and the analysis would be different.

RE: Flat Heads and UG-34

I've used the following formulas in the past:

Mx = (p/16)[(d2/4)(1+µ)-(r2)(3+µ)]
Mz = (p/16)[(d2/4)(1+µ)-(r2)(1+3µ)]
From Process Equipment Design: Vessel Design, p102 eq 6.50 and 6.51

σx = 6Mx/t2
σz = 6Mz/t2
From Process Equipment Design: Vessel Design, p102 eq 6.55

Plug in the allowable stress for σx, σz. Solve then stress equations for t. Then combined with the moment equations to get the required thickness of the cap as a function of r. Use whichever t is larger, for any given radius.

I'm not entirely sure if this is legal for the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. I'm rather new to engineering, and I don't have a good mentor at my workplace, but this method seemed to make sense to me.


RE: Flat Heads and UG-34

zakk, what is it you are wanting to do?

If you want to 1) vary thickness w/ radius, I would say UG-34 does not support this, although it is true greatest thickness would be required in the center. As well, it seems un-efficient to manufacture such a head as opposed to cutting a circle from plate.

2) Thin at the edge, such as for a groove, if so see UG-34 under Sketches (j) and (k).

Regards,

Mike

The problem with sloppy work is that the supply FAR EXCEEDS the demand

RE: Flat Heads and UG-34

(OP)
SnTMan;

What we are trying to do is design a clamp connection similar to Appendix 24, except replace one of the Hubs by a Flat Head. I attached a sketch of a general configuration. According to Fig UG-34(m) for a mechanically locked Head, the diameter "d" should be taken as the outside diameter of the Head (Dimension "C" in the sketch). I take that to mean tmin should taken all the way to the periphery of the plate. I have seen numerous ASME Code parts, namely flat head closures, where this is not the case. The Head is held in place with a lip inserted into a clamp ring and the lip is a fraction of tmin.

I discussed this with my AIA. They agree that the maximum bending stress is located at the plate center, however the stress (and required thickness) as one moves away from the center is a grey area and if I can rationalize the thickness reduction, they will consider it. The question is... how? I could break the Head into a series if concentric rings and calculate the moments and shear at each interface to develop a system of equations (Roark & Young, 8th Ed Para 11.7). If someone can walk me through that I'd appreciate it.

We are considering burst testing (UG-101(m)) the assembly to address any ambiguity in the design. However, since I can't use burst testing to override Code rules, I'm back to my first question... is the intent of UG-34(m) to carry tmin to the outer periphery of the plate?

RE: Flat Heads and UG-34

zakk, I am not at all familar w/ Apx 24 and these connections, however:

If designed per UG-34 I'd say the "d" dimension is equal to the pressure seal diameter, dim "A" in your sketch, as per Fig UG-34, sketches j & k. I'd say you need to maintain tmin to this diameter. Then perhaps the thickness of the section from A to B would be subject to the thickness under the groove per these sketches. I would take the lip thickness from B to C to be subject to Apx 24 rules.

Alternatively, you could decide the whole thing is a U-2(g) design. Roarke, I believe, has equations for thickness of circular plates as a function of radius, which you could presuambly use. Don't know how or if Apx 24 would relate to this approach.

As to the concentric rings approach I guess you'd equate the deflections and slopes either side of the interface and solve the systems of equations for thickness. I guess. Selecting the proper edge condition could be troublesome. Again, don't know how / if Apx 24 would relate.

Not much help, I'm afraid :)

Mike

The problem with sloppy work is that the supply FAR EXCEEDS the demand

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources