INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Jobs

A question about Example 7-1 of CT Trenching and shoring manual

A question about Example 7-1 of CT Trenching and shoring manual

(OP)
Hi, I am trying to design a braced soldier pile wall with the help of CT manual, but I seem to have problem finding the required depth of embedment of piles. According to the manual I need to take moments about brace location on the pile to calculate embedment depth using a factor of safety of 1.3. Doing that leads to a third degree equation which gives only negative roots for D. I checked the example 7-1 of the manual (page 7-14) and put M_R=1.3M_D on page 7-18 which in turn gave me this equation

D^3+25.66D^2+94.96D+185.71=0

which also gives negative values for D and off coarse totally different from what the manual suggested which is

D^3+18.7D^2-114.53D-223.98=0

I checked the procedure before equation above and they all seem to be right but putting M_R=1.3M_D just doesn't give D^3+18.7D^2-114.53D-223.98=0.
I just wonder if there is something wrong with the procedure suggested by the CT manual or I'm just too stupid to do basic calculation :)

I found a link to mentioned example here (http://files.engineering.com/download.aspx?folder=...)
would you please take a look at page 7-18 and help me with that example. Thanks.

RE: A question about Example 7-1 of CT Trenching and shoring manual

What the example in the manual does not make clear is that when you set M_R equal to 1.3 M_D, the sign on M_R is negative. This is because the sum of the moments equals zero (M_R + M_D = 0) for the stable condition. When you move M_R to the other side of the equation, it is negative. So when you solver for D you are actual solving the equation -M_R=1.3 M_D. When you do that, you get the results in the example.

RE: A question about Example 7-1 of CT Trenching and shoring manual

(OP)
Thank you Panars, that solved my problem... Seems that I have forgotten simple equilibrium equations :)

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close