×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
• Talk With Other Members
• Be Notified Of Responses
• Keyword Search
Favorite Forums
• Automated Signatures
• Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

#### Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

# Soil Bearing Capacity by SPT

## Soil Bearing Capacity by SPT

(OP)
Metric Units
Meyerholf's formula when B<=1.22m ----> qa = 12NFd where Fd=1+0.33D/B <=1.33 and B>=1.22m ---> qa=8N[(B+0.305)/B]^2(Fd).

Assume N=5 blows,D=2m and B>1.22m. The only variable we can play with is B. It could be larger or smaller but not less than 1.22m for second eq applicability.
Trial 1. Let B=1.5m, Fd=1+0.33(2/1.5)=1.44, use 1.33. Thus qa=8*5[(1.5+0.305)/1.5]^2(1.44)=77.03 kPa

Trial 2. Let B=2m, Fd=1.825, use 1.33. Thus qa=70.66 kPa

Can anyone explain what is the implication of the difference between the trials given that B=2m is larger in width but gives lesser allowable bearing capacity?

### RE: Soil Bearing Capacity by SPT

qa=8N[(B+0.305)/B]^2(Fd) can also be expressed as qa=8N[((B/B)+(0.305/B))]^2(Fd)

You are saying that when you increase b your qa goes down well look at what happens as your B goes to infinity. B/B will remain 1 however 0.305/B will get closer to zero as B increases which means as B approaches infinity the section i brought up goes lower until it theoretically equals one. The same thing happens when you are equating Fd. If B gets larger than Fd will theoretically get smaller. I think you have run the equation incorrectly.

In reality if Depth stays the same and B gets larger than your bearing capacity should go up. Id check your equation.

### RE: Soil Bearing Capacity by SPT

If the Meyerhof equations are such that it limiting settlements (I have not gone into this for a long time) or at least taking this into account to a degree, the bigger (wider) the footing, the more soil depth beneath is stressed and the bearing pressure (note, I say pressure for serviceabity purposes rather than capacity which is a strength concept) would have to decrease. Just look at the standard charts of N vs bearing pressure for 1 inch (25 mm) settlement as you find in Bowles or many other texts. By the way - if you have N = 5 for a granular soil, you must think about punching conditions as well.

### RE: Soil Bearing Capacity by SPT

(OP)
Appreciate the replies.

Blackbear09, I am glad that you are going to check the equation and I do agree that if depth remains unchanged for an increasing size in B the capacity has to be larger but look at the curves BigH suggests, I suppose these are what he meant. In the sample problem, the curve shows that as B increases qa consequently decreases.
Extracted from Bowles text book.

### RE: Soil Bearing Capacity by SPT

You might be interested in a paper by Zekkos, Bray and Kiureghian (University of California, Berkeley) entitled: "Reliability of shallow foundation design using the standard penetration test" - Google the title and you should find it. It explains using N for bearing capacity (shear), bearing pressure (serviceability - i.e., settlement) and then goes on to reliability index, etc.

#### Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

#### Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Close Box

# Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

• Talk To Other Members
• Notification Of Responses To Questions
• Favorite Forums One Click Access
• Keyword Search Of All Posts, And More...

Register now while it's still free!