×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Torsion and Flange Warping Restraint
2

Torsion and Flange Warping Restraint

Torsion and Flange Warping Restraint

(OP)
So, I thought I had a grasp on this -- but recent questions from a colleague have me wondering again.

The base of the question is when do warping normal and shear stresses develop in an open cross-section beam with torsion? For the sake of simplicity, let's consider only simply supported beams.

AISC Design Guide 9 goes to great lengths (p. 3, 11, 12, 14, etc) to express that when a member is allowed to warp freely, warping stresses do not develop. I've taken this "warping freely" primarily to be in the absence of fixed-style flange end connections, flange stiffeners or added webs at the flange tips, kickers, etc. (See WillisV response in http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=340161)

But then, in the design examples and torsional functions, members that are flexurally and torsionally pinned (presumably a simple shear tab connection) are shown to develop Θ" and therefore warping normal stresses along the length of the members.

The best explanation I can think of is that the rate of change of twist itself is restraining each cross-sectional slice of a beam with respect to the adjacent slices. But if this is the case, and I'd imagine it would be the case in nearly every structural application, why would AISC even discuss a mythical "freely warping" beam?

What am I missing here? Thanks!

RE: Torsion and Flange Warping Restraint

A warping unrestrained (i.e. Torsionally pinned) connection means that warping stresses cannot develop at the connections where there is no restraint to prevent warping of the cross section. But, as you suggest, warping stresses can and will develop along the length of the member.

Whenever these types of questions come up, I always like to point people towards figure 4.4 and section 4.1.4 of the design guide. This give you a nice physical analogy for how warping stresses work. And, using this analogy you can come up with really quick approximate calculations rather than the crazy complex ones described in the rest of the design guide. I also use it to calculate warping stresses for situations that just aren't covered in the design guide.... Like situations that are somewhere between warping restrained and warping unrestrained.

RE: Torsion and Flange Warping Restraint

(OP)
Oh, I understand and appreciate the flange lateral bending analogy for warping normal stresses -- definitely easier (both to perform and to explain to a checker).

Still, the question remains -- do warping stresses always apply for I-shape members? And if so, why discuss free or restrained warping at all?

RE: Torsion and Flange Warping Restraint

That terminology applies to the CONNECTION and whether the connection restrains warping or not. But, there is always some degree of warping in a wide flange subject to torsion.

Think of a moment connection with warping restraint at the end. This could be a pull pen moment connection with continuity plates in the column. This connection will develop large warping normal stresses at the location of maximum bending stresses.

Alternatively think of a moment connection where the flanges are free to warp. Maybe a case without continuity plates and where the column flange is relatively thin and can't provide much differential restraint to those beam flanges. This warping "unrestrained" moment connection will develop warping stresses in the member more towards the mid-point of the member. That's a location where the bending / flexural stresses are maybe 50% of what they would be at the connection location.

There is a tendency in our profession to ignore warping stress for simply supported beams. Typical example would be a clip angle connection. It provides torsional restraint, but not warping restraint at the end of the beam. There will be warping stresses along the length of that beam. Though many engineers ignore it. Not saying that's right or wrong. Just that I don't see many folks considering this.

To me, it's an engineering judgment call depending on how significant the torsion is. I personally prefer to use the flange bending analogy as a quick check to see how significant it is compared to the flexural stresses. Then I decide whether to include or ignore it.

RE: Torsion and Flange Warping Restraint

(OP)
Alright, I still don't know why AISC DG9 explains it the way it does.

But after some more research, I found the SCI guide for Design of steel beams in torsion, which confirmed that the flange restraint can come from external sources (connection details) or develop internally (cross sections restrain each other when torsion varies along the length of the member). Also had a handful of other useful charts. I recommend it.

Thanks for your help Josh!

RE: Torsion and Flange Warping Restraint

Answers to specific questions

Quote (Lomarandil)

do warping stresses always apply for I-shape members?

Almost, but not quite, always. See the sketch below for a highly contrived example of a beam that is able to warp freely (relatively speaking).

Quote (Lomarandil)

And if so, why discuss free or restrained warping at all?

For the most part because a discussion of torsional theory would be incomplete without it. To a lesser extent because there are a few, semi-practical cases of unrestrained warping torsion.

Additional commentary

- if a beam is torsionally fixed (encasement, full pen continuity plates, etc) at any point, it will not be able to warp freely and will develop normal and shear stresses as result of warping.

- if a beam is torsionally pinned (conventional shear connections etc) at two or more locations, it will not be able to warp freely and will develop normal and shear stresses as a result of warping. This is the part that throws people. The beam in question will be warping restrained between torsional supports in the same sense that a simply supported beam, symmetric in all respects, is effectively fixed for strong axis bending at mid-span (zero rotation).

- Beams that are able to warp freely are pretty rare. That's why one gets the impression that it's a case hardly worth discussing. Fee warping is generally precluded by one or more of the following:

1) Code specified limitations on where beam rotational restraint must be provided (LTB stuff).
2) Established practices that form the basis of sound detailing.

It's worth noting that the example shown in the sketch below would have a very high effective length factor with regard to lateral torsional buckling capacity. That is a direct consequence of the fact that the detail permits free warping or something close to it. I would expect that to be the case for virtually all open section beams that are allowed to warp freely.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Torsion and Flange Warping Restraint

Crap. I didn't see your post regarding the SCI info before submitting my post. Same idea, just expressed much, much more succinctly by SCI it seems

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Torsion and Flange Warping Restraint

(OP)
No worries -- the more clarification, the better.

RE: Torsion and Flange Warping Restraint

I guess this seems like asking why beams without moment connections still develope flexural moments - of course they do - it's just zero at the ends.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources