×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Sign convention of CBUSH forces

Sign convention of CBUSH forces

Sign convention of CBUSH forces

(OP)
I have obtained the forces of a set of CBUSH elements with the ELFORCE output command. What I'm now wondering about: what exactly determines whether a force component is positive or negative?

I have the feeling that the answer will be quite trivial, but thus far I haven't been able to fully figure it out yet. If anyone could provide some insight I'd very grateful!

RE: Sign convention of CBUSH forces

Hi Zadrobu, I would assume the coordinate system defined for the element should help you understand the sign convension. Do a test by changing your CBUSH coordinate orientation and check the kind of signs you get for the forces ()X-axis along the CBUSH elm)

RE: Sign convention of CBUSH forces

(OP)
Thanks for the reply. I had not mentioned this yet, but I'm generating all my force outputs for the global coordinate system 0. The problem was that I didn't understood at which location the force was evaluated and whether it was an action or a reaction force (all of which should affect the sign). I have done some tests like you suggested however. It seems to me now that the ELFORCE output from CBUSHes is always equivalent to the force that the CBUSH exerts on the first grid defined in the CBUSH card. Anything definitive regarding all this I have not been able to find in any of the Nastran manuals.

RE: Sign convention of CBUSH forces

Useful link about CBUSH elements: Link

RE: Sign convention of CBUSH forces

(OP)

Quote (gantovnik)

Useful link about CBUSH elements: Link
Good info, thanks!

RE: Sign convention of CBUSH forces

Checked the document too, but still it tries giving a couple of "what if" examples. I found this error when I started working on Airbus A350xwb Wing Ribs, and it turned out some of the fastener tension/compression loads had wrong directions. I want to summarize as follows:
Rule 1) The direction of the coordinate axis should align with the direction from "Grid A to Grid B" of the bush element.
Rule 2) The "positive" direction of your coordinate system (for tension/compression direction - also known as: fastener axial coordinate) should "first meet" the plate which belongs to Grid A.

In the below snapshot, I also added the vice-versa cases. This should cover everything. You may also add RBE2/RBAR elements to the Grids in case you have geometrical offset between your bush and plate nodes.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources