×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

RHS Side Wall Capacity Check

RHS Side Wall Capacity Check

RHS Side Wall Capacity Check

(OP)
Hi all,

Currently going through the design of the glazed roof system, as shown below.

In particular, I'm having a good look at the connection of the cantilevered/tapered "T" member (multi-coloured 380BT) coming into the main beam(grey 400x300x8.0 RHS).

I would like to check the capacity of the RHS side wall if I were to directly weld the "T" member. Note I've used the plastic section modulus for the RHS side wall.

My design philosophy so far: Would be great if anybody could provide some feedback on my philosophy and/or ideas about this connection.





RE: RHS Side Wall Capacity Check

I believe that the method that you have proposed is reasonable and, as you are finding, probably rather conservative. The only change that I would suggest is that I would call the side wall pinned rather than fixed. There is some fixity, of course, but it will be partial and a pain to assess.

Most of the compression force will be concentrated close to the tip of the WT stem because the side wall will be stiffest there. As such, you're going to get a tension force very high on the RHS side wall and a compression force very low on the RHS sidewall. That should greatly reduce the flexural demand on the RHS side wall and simultaneously increase the local demands on your welds (unless you're claiming compression bearing at the stem tip).

There are a few documents that would be relevant here:

1) AISC design guide on HSS connections by Packer.
2) The CIDECT design guies.

To my knowledge, neither document covers exactly this case. However, they both cover similar cases and a review of the documents might generate some good ideas. This is a very common scenario. I imagine that everyone has their own take on it. Hopefully we see some of that show up in this thread.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: RHS Side Wall Capacity Check

(OP)
Hmmmm, I suppose it comes back to the good old engineering judgement.

I understand where you are coming from regarding the tens/comp forces will tend towards the RHS return sidewalls.

If the sidewalls are pinned however, it also increases the flexural demand on the plate element in question...

Would a reasonable solution be to weld the T section to say a 16mm plate, which is then welded onto the side of the RHS?

Would be good to hear from anyone who has done a similar connection.

EDIT: Do you just register on the CIDECT website to download the PDF's which are "free of charge?"

RE: RHS Side Wall Capacity Check

Quote (Trenno)

Would a reasonable solution be to weld the T section to say a 16mm plate, which is then welded onto the side of the RHS?

I wouldn't do this. The CHS wall shouldn't be the limiting factor here. It should definitely be possible to make this work with a direct weld.

Quote (Trenno)

Do you just register on the CIDECT website to download the PDF's which are "free of charge?"

It's been a while but I believe so.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: RHS Side Wall Capacity Check

No doubt one could class this up with the right yield line model.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: RHS Side Wall Capacity Check

(OP)
Thanks for the sketch, KootK. Throwing a spanner into the works here, but I forgot to add there is a nice cutout for the gutter in the T section.

All along I've assumed the bending stresses can 'follow' the flange around the cutout, as the section actually gets deeper than 400mm... How would one check this though?

RE: RHS Side Wall Capacity Check

I think you should consider bi-moment in RHS due to non-uniform torsion and warping effect.

RE: RHS Side Wall Capacity Check

(OP)
Most definitely!^

That's why I'm going with a large and somewhat thick hollow section.

RE: RHS Side Wall Capacity Check

Quote (Trenno)

All along I've assumed the bending stresses can 'follow' the flange around the cutout, as the section actually gets deeper than 400mm... How would one check this though?

Without introducing web stiffeners, it would be very difficult. You get cross flange bending and concentrated web loads at the flange knuckles. I would try to make it work using just the web section strength at the flange knuckle locations.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: RHS Side Wall Capacity Check

When I've done something similar in the past I've also checked the bearing on the RHS (especially at bottom flange). Your code probably has equations for bearing on hollow sections for a concentrated load acting over a bearing length, and for resultant combined stresses from bearing and bending in the RHS.

Some sort of check for the transverse and longitudinal stresses in the RHS is also warranted at the connection. At the top and bottom flanges the flange forces result in a tension/compression across the RHS flange that must be combined with the normal longitudinal bending stresses.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources