×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

ASME Y14.5 standard for Reference Dimensions?

ASME Y14.5 standard for Reference Dimensions?

ASME Y14.5 standard for Reference Dimensions?

(OP)
I couldn't find anything in the ASME Y14.5-2009 standard that governs the identification of reference dimensions. True, they are most commonly identified with parenthesis (1.250), but is there anything that controls this by way of actual standard?
The real application to my question is in checking a drawing, where the notes state:
1. INTERPRET DRAWING PER ASME Y14.5-2009
2. DIMENSIONS IN PARENTHESIS FOR REFERENCE ONLY

I'm trying to find out if note 2 is redundant, based on note 1.

Thanks for any input on this!

- Bill

RE: ASME Y14.5 standard for Reference Dimensions?

ASME Y14.5-2009 section 1.7.6

"The method for identifying a reference dimension (or reference data) on drawings is to enclose the dimension (or data) within parentheses. See Figs. 1-19 and 1-20."

RE: ASME Y14.5 standard for Reference Dimensions?

(OP)
Tank you lifttrucks, not sure how I missed that!
- Bill

RE: ASME Y14.5 standard for Reference Dimensions?

liftrucks beat me to it smile

As a consolation, similar statement from ISO 8015:2011
...
8 Rules for statements in parentheses
Statements given in parentheses are only for information and do not constitute an integral part of the
specification/requirement.
...

"For every expert there is an equal and opposite expert"
Arthur C. Clarke Profiles of the future

RE: ASME Y14.5 standard for Reference Dimensions?

What the standard does not tell you is there are scads of people who do not know about reference dimensions.

RE: ASME Y14.5 standard for Reference Dimensions?

(OP)
LOL, I find myself in a "we've always done it that way" sort of shop. I'm also trying to convince them that they don't need either note because it's an electrical drawing. [ponder]

RE: ASME Y14.5 standard for Reference Dimensions?

I will second TheTick.

I actually stopped myself from posting a comment asking if you think the redundancy is bad. Just because it's covered in the Tome of ASME Y14.5 doesn't necessarily mean it's not valuable to place a specific comment in the notes reiterating something. For instance, I had dealt with someone asking for relief on a dimension they couldn't hold within tolerance. They were within the true position but couldn't get the linear location to work out right because it was so much tighter. It turned out they were applying the dimension tolerance from the "Unless Otherwise.." note, to a hole because of a BASIC dimension. So while they understood the feature control frame, they apparently didn't come across BASIC dimensions often enough to remember how to interpret them.

I've had the same happen regarding reference dimensions more than once, as well, even on drawings in the past that were suffixed "REF" instead of parenthesis.

Sometimes it can save time, confusion, hassle, and response-times just to have a little "risk avoidance" in a redundant comment. Just my 2 cents.

_________________________________________
NX8.0, Solidworks 2014, AutoCAD, Enovia V5

RE: ASME Y14.5 standard for Reference Dimensions?

(OP)
Point taken, JN. The "ounce of prevention" thinking comes into play here. I will be sure to let them know that it's not "wrong" to have note 2 in place, just redundant.

RE: ASME Y14.5 standard for Reference Dimensions?

I avoid reference data entirely. What's contained within parenthesis is only fluff and does not constitute a requirement. Some people erroneously use the reference information to tell them what needs to be; that is they don't understand that the information is just fluff and that they need to look elsewhere for hard requirements.

Tunalover

RE: ASME Y14.5 standard for Reference Dimensions?

(OP)
I use them on nearly every assembly print (small tool assemblies) at the assembly level, where they are essentially L x W x H "self-fulfilling" dimensions (I saw that term used here within another thread on reference dimensions, and thought it captured the meaning quite well). I also use them at the detail level, if the intent is to use "stock size", although I'm still debating with myself if that's really a legitimate application.

RE: ASME Y14.5 standard for Reference Dimensions?

I think it is a mistake to add such redundant information in the notes because it opens the question of which other aspects of the standard may or may not apply.

"Know the rules well, so you can break them effectively."
-Dalai Lama XIV

RE: ASME Y14.5 standard for Reference Dimensions?

I'll also sometimes add them to assembly drawings to people dealing with it have a feeling for the size.

In fact back in the days when I have to have deliverable items NATO codified it was essential to have the overall dimensions indicated.

Posting guidelines FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm? (probably not aimed specifically at you)
What is Engineering anyway: FAQ1088-1484: In layman terms, what is "engineering"?

RE: ASME Y14.5 standard for Reference Dimensions?

The company I work for insists on using REF to indicate reference dimensions. I've given up on trying to convert to ().

RE: ASME Y14.5 standard for Reference Dimensions?

Using REF is still insanely common, I find, even in major companies that proclaim adherence to ASME Y14.5 of some flavor or another. I assume it is in their own company standards that they allow for the use of REF or maybe their "unwritten" standards ;)

If you're a company that doesn't plan on your prints being used outside of a very-majorly English speaking country then I don't think it will cause unintended consequences, at least. Otherwise...

_________________________________________
NX8.0, Solidworks 2014, AutoCAD, Enovia V5

RE: ASME Y14.5 standard for Reference Dimensions?

Odd thing - in accounting (x.xx) is a negative number. REF is always reference. I think accountants established their standard before ASME had a shot at it.

RE: ASME Y14.5 standard for Reference Dimensions?

Minimize the usage of reference dims... If they're helpful for someone in some way, go ahead and put them on, but the standard shows them indicated with parenthesis.

Please, please, please, use the correct terms!They're Datum Features NOT DATUMS!!! AAAAAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAAAAA" -- Don Day

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources