×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

#### Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
• Talk With Other Members
• Be Notified Of Responses
To Your Posts
• Keyword Search
• One-Click Access To Your
Favorite Forums
• Automated Signatures
On Your Posts
• Best Of All, It's Free!
• Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

#### Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

# AASHTO LRFD 7th Edition Section 3.6.5 - Vehicle Collision Force CT

 Forum Search FAQs Links MVPs

## AASHTO LRFD 7th Edition Section 3.6.5 - Vehicle Collision Force CT

(OP)
When analyzing an existing pier column for vehicle impact capacity, a 600 kip static load is placed at 5 feet above ground level. All of the current analysis examples I've seen assume a dual plane shear failure mode. Each plane extends through the pier column at 45 degrees above and below the point of impact. This all seems to make sense. However, looking at pictures of failed pier columns due to these types of impacts, I'm curious why only the concrete and horizontal stirrups shear capacity is calculated for resistance? The main vertical reinforcement passes through the shear failure planes at the same angle as the stirrups (45 degrees), is fully anchored at both ends, is confined by the stirrups, and shows similar damage after these impacts. So why cannot the cross sectional area of the main vertical reinforcement be included with the stirrups when calculating the shear capacity contribution of the reinforcing steel? It's not a beam where the main reinforcing steel is in a constant state of compressive or tensile stress. It's stress level at any given time can be assumed to be fairly minimal, particularly on short columned (15 to 25 feet) piers.

I would appreciate any input that would clarify this restriction, and comment on its real world legitimacy. Thank You.

#### Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

#### Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

### Reply To This Thread

#### Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!

Close Box

# Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

• Talk To Other Members
• Notification Of Responses To Questions
• Favorite Forums One Click Access
• Keyword Search Of All Posts, And More...

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.