×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Merge geometry or tie constraint

Merge geometry or tie constraint

Merge geometry or tie constraint

(OP)
Hello,
What type of modelling in Abaqus do you prefer?
I mean when it is recommended to merge geometry from parts into single large part?
How often do you use tie constraint?
As far I know the effect is almost the same - we can tie together parts of the geometry - we can tie together degrees of freedom at nodes.

What is influence of using tie constraint/merging mesh on results of the analysis?
Let's assume, that in both cases the finite element mesh is the same.

Thanks.

RE: Merge geometry or tie constraint

Assuming the same mesh in the two cases:

From a numerical point of view, with *TIE, you are still left with additional equations in the stiffness matrix because you have more nodes, whose slave DOFs will be eliminated from the computations before handing over the matrix equation to the solver.

From a practical standpoint:

a) In a small model, difference will not be apparent. However, in a computationally expensive analysis, number of nodes/nodal DOFs matters.
b) If the displacement solution is varying smoothly over the computational domain, then again, no difference will be seen. If the displacement solution does NOT vary smoothly or has a sharp transition, *TIE will show a discontinuity/sharper transition.

Kinematic constraints (such as *TIE) are to be used in situations where the meshes simply can not be matched at the interface. Same mesh or not, it is preferable to reduce the number of nodes and ensure displacement continuity, if you can - this is one of those areas where the 'art' lies. More generally, too, one must strive for a 'simple' model (while capturing all the phenomena of interest as best as possible and ensuring low computational cost - particularly during the method development stage.)

Good question.

*********************************************************
Are you new to this forum? If so, please read these FAQs:

http://www.eng-tips.com/faqs.cfm?fid=376
http://www.eng-tips.com/faqs.cfm?fid=1083

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources