×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Pier and Spandral

Pier and Spandral

Pier and Spandral

(OP)
Hey, what is the difference between pier and spandral in RC structures
also what is the different if i simulate them using frame or shell element in etbas

thanks

RE: Pier and Spandral

Are you speaking in general terms, or are you referring to the terms as they are used specifically in ETABS?

If the former:

1. A PIER can be: (a) a short column ( e.g. "pedestal"), (b) a deep foundation (e.g. "drilled pier"), (c) an interior support for a bridge superstructure that is in turn typically supported by a foundation ("bridge pier"), or (d) supports for a dock or wharf typically over water.

2. A SPANDREL is usually a girder at the edge of a slab system into which floor beams are framed, and which is considered to resist torsion as well as flexure resulting from the framing members.

I'm not sure how you can reliably compare the two as aside from the fact that they are structural elements, they aren't really similar. What is your application?

RE: Pier and Spandral

(OP)
THANK you all.

Now I understand that simply pier is a column and spandrel is a beam, but I still have two questions,

I think etabs allow you to draw the pier and spandrel both using shell and frame element, so is there any difference between them(frame and shell) in this case of analysis?

Also, when I use the ACI modifiers of o.35 or 0.7, I usually apply this to moment modifiers, but I ve seen posts how apply this to axial as well, so why this is the case? Please explain it to me? And this raise the question of apply to shear maybe???

RE: Pier and Spandral

Ok so you dont draw pier or spandrel first, you draw the shell or frame element and the you assign labels like pier or spandrel.
This labels dont interact or affect the FEM stress analisys at all, their role is to integrate, sum, the stresses to give you the axial force, shear and bending moment for that section that you label. So in the analisys no, it doesnt matter, it matters if you let ETABS do the design for you,from what i read on this forum, i never used design option so far, for example to calculate necesary reinforcement areas.
I also never tried to invert them, pier and label, to see what happens but i said that integrated forces are the same because ther is only one why to integrate stress, so..

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources