×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Minimum Footing thickness as per ACI 318

Minimum Footing thickness as per ACI 318

Minimum Footing thickness as per ACI 318

(OP)
Dear expert engineers, I have a query.
For RC footing design as per ACI 318, we use development for tension (Ldt) as L bar and for compression (Ldc) for the straight part of the same bar coming as column rebar/ dowel. Bot Ldt and Ldc can be proportionately reduced as per the induced tension/ compression stresses in the bar. But there are minimum requirement of Ldc = 200 mm in ACI 318M-11. Eventually I have to decide the minimum thickness of the footing based on this 200 mm value.
Whereas in 15.7 clause of the same code, the minimum footing thickness recommended as 150 mm.
Various books stae that compressive stree distribution in compression transfer throgh bearing and passes to footing in 1V:2H slope. So why do we need to retain 200 mm minimum Ldc requirement?

Can anybody put some light on it?


RE: Minimum Footing thickness as per ACI 318

I usually hook the bars to get around this problem but I'd also say that you're right and compression development of the bars at the footing shouldn't be a concern.

Maine Professional and Structural Engineer
American Concrete Industries
www.americanconcrete.com

RE: Minimum Footing thickness as per ACI 318

It sounds as though your concern is mostly for the compression case since you're proposing bearing as a solution. Hooks won't help for compression.

I prefer to make my footings thick enough to develop my column bars in compression. While plain bearing may well work numerically, mobilizing it with undeveloped dowels would imply bond failure of those dowels as the rebar load path gives way and the bearing path takes over. And once that happens, the dowels instantly become useless for tension, compression, and shear friction.

One solution is to use smaller dowels. They don't necessarily have to match your column verticals in size.

It's also worth noting that as columns creep, axial stress in the cross section tends to migrate towards the reinforcing steel.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Minimum Footing thickness as per ACI 318

I always forget that hooks don't help in compression...

Maine Professional and Structural Engineer
American Concrete Industries
www.americanconcrete.com

RE: Minimum Footing thickness as per ACI 318

I'm sure they kinda do.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Minimum Footing thickness as per ACI 318

(OP)
Yes, my concern is compression, as it is ultimately guiding the thickness. If the footing is supporting a very minor load, and my Ldc calculated is 75 mm (3"), say, still I have to use Ldc, min = 200 mm which will land up to minimum 325 mm overall thickness. In the cut-throat EPC business environment, every mm counts money. Code does not explicitly tells you to comply this L,dc for footing. Books are also giving the dispersion theory in a way that Ldc, requirement is not at all concern.
I do not have any reservation to provide Ldc, calculated, by why minimum is 200 mm?
Eurocode 2 -1-1 gives Ldc, min = Ldt, min = 100 mm which is more logical.

RE: Minimum Footing thickness as per ACI 318

Quote (pjyb1962)

In the cut-throat EPC business environment, every mm counts money

Please. EPC is frenzy of frivolous spending compared to residential.

Quote (pjyb1962)

Eurocode 2 -1-1 gives Ldc, min = Ldt, min = 100 mm which is more logical.

What makes the Eurocode value more logical? Simply the fact that you like the answer better?

Quote (pjyb1962)

I do not have any reservation to provide Ldc, calculated, by why minimum is 200 mm?

Because some smart people put their heads together and set some reasonable limits to help keep folks from doing silly things. Are you really so gung go to install a 6" footing, with 3" bottom cover in an industrial facility? What if someone drives over it with a bicycle or a skateboard?

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources