×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Tilt-Up Wall Nominal Moment Capacity vs Cracked Moment Capacity

Tilt-Up Wall Nominal Moment Capacity vs Cracked Moment Capacity

Tilt-Up Wall Nominal Moment Capacity vs Cracked Moment Capacity

(OP)
In ACI 318-11 Section 14.8.2.4, it gives a requirement that the nominal moment capacity of a concrete wall shall be greater than the cracking moment of that wall. My question is that if all of my factored loads (Pu, Mu, Vu) are all lower than the allowable nominal values (Pn, Mn, Vn) and my combined axial and flexural calculations are sufficient, and the only thing that doesn't check out in my calculations is the Mc<Mn, is it unreasonable to say that the panel is sufficient? I'm trying to understand the theory behind the Mc<Mn equation and why it requires me to put more reinforcement into my panel when I am at a Mu/Mn ratio of less than 0.15 for all cases. Worst case scenario is that my nominal moment is 15% larger than my cracking moment. Can someone explain to me the importance of this check??

Thanks in advance!

RE: Tilt-Up Wall Nominal Moment Capacity vs Cracked Moment Capacity

If the flexural strength of the panel is less than the cracking moment, the panel could fail suddenly without warning as soon as the cracking moment is exceeded. We consider this a problem with gravity loaded members and would prefer gradual member failure/sagging that would hopefully alert occupants of an impending failure.

I consider this less important, and might be willing to waive the requirement, for a wall panel where the bending loads are mainly the result of transient environmental effects (Wind/EQ). Another option, for complete code compliance, might be to treat the panel as plain concrete.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Tilt-Up Wall Nominal Moment Capacity vs Cracked Moment Capacity

Also consider that it's not unusual for the bending moments during panel lifting to exceed those for the in-place loads. You definitely don't want a sudden failure while lifting the panel.

RE: Tilt-Up Wall Nominal Moment Capacity vs Cracked Moment Capacity

(OP)
Well for my case, the panel has already been installed but they did not put the openings in the panel correctly so I'm not worried about lifting loads.

RE: Tilt-Up Wall Nominal Moment Capacity vs Cracked Moment Capacity

In an existing application, I'd be even more willing to let it slide. Bending forces result mostly from wind and earthquake rather than eccentrically applied gravity load, right?

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Tilt-Up Wall Nominal Moment Capacity vs Cracked Moment Capacity

(OP)
I would say so. Considering our panel is only exposed to the wind above the 4th floor there really isn't a lot of wind on the panel to begin with. The location is very low seismic and is not even required by local jurisdiction to be checked. I believe you have answered my question and confirmed my thoughts that there is some wiggle room with this check.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources