×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Thought on element selection

Thought on element selection

Thought on element selection

(OP)
Before I get to the question, the background. I am solving a 2D plane strain problem. An attached image shows the typical deflections. There are multiple materials and a beam element runs almost horizontally down the center. I have a pretty good handle on what the different options on the elements mean, mathematically, but I am lost on what in practice is the difference and reason for selection. I have run the model with almost every combination and for one load case and see about a 2-3% difference mainly when changed from linear to quadratic in the plane strain elements. One of the materials has a poisson's ratio v=~0.5, so all elements are hybrid. So far I have tried.

For the planar portion
CPE8RH
CPE8H
CPE4H
CPE4IH

CPE6MH
CPE6H
CPE3H

For the Beam:
B22
B21
B23

The planar elements make up a majority of the structures stiffness. I have read through the manual but it can go back and forth on which elements are better for bending dominated problems (though I think since there are so many elements through the vertical direction, this is not bending dominated), which elements produce a more accurate result and etc. But again it gets very difficult to determine from its vague language what would be a good choice for me.

Since this is for an optimization study and not a super exact model, should I just call the %3 difference in elements insignificant and choose what gives me the best results, or convergence the best at large deflections?

More potentially useful information:
-NLGEOM on
-The model is used in optimization but the models solves quick enough that the expense of one element over another is not significant.




RE: Thought on element selection

(OP)
I was really hoping someone would have some practical advise on this, hopefully with some insight beyond strictly the element definitions.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources