×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Steel Plate vs. Elastomeric Bearing

Steel Plate vs. Elastomeric Bearing

Steel Plate vs. Elastomeric Bearing

(OP)

I need a bearing pad to support the transfer beam which takes excessive loads from
exterior load-bearing walls of several floors in the precast concrete parking structure.
If I want to use a steel plate instead of elastomeric bearing pad, what factors should I consider?
(This will be located at 0.5" joint between transfer beam bearing plate and column corbel bearing plate.)
I am concerned about future corrosion problem.
Also, do you think it is really bad idea using a galvanized steel plate?

I am looking forward to your comments.

Thanks!

RE: Steel Plate vs. Elastomeric Bearing

Quote (OP)

If I want to use a steel plate instead of elastomeric bearing pad, what factors should I consider?

You may want to give some consideration to the fact that a steel plate won't accommodate supported member rotation like an elastomeric bearing assembly will. You'll get high localized bearing stresses and potential for spalling at the front of your corbel.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Steel Plate vs. Elastomeric Bearing

Excellent points Kootk. You definitely want to consider beam end rotation and translation when designing a parking structure, and a elastomeric bearing pad will allow you to accommodate those movements a lot better than with a steel bearing plate. I would also like to add that elastomeric bearing pads provide great damping for your structure and will help reduce vibrations due to live loads and impact loading. Also, from an economical standpoint elastomeric bearing pads will more than likely be cheaper because they have pretty much no maintenance costs associated with them.

RE: Steel Plate vs. Elastomeric Bearing

I have inspected numerous 'sliding' connections which are piles of rust. I don't think they move much anymore. Just another point to consider

RE: Steel Plate vs. Elastomeric Bearing

How excessive is excessive? Personally, elastomeric bearings are the better way to go. If rotations are a concern sliding plates could be a problem.

However, a steel bearing with a curved sole plate will also take care of the rotations - see attached drawing. I used these recently on a bridge project that involved widening an existing structure. Since the existing steel bearings will remain I used a steel bearing - copied from a 1970's DOT standard - rather than mix and match elastomeric with steel. These are taking about 60k.

If you want to use steel on steel (or more like steel on PTFE) Google Lubrite or Fluorgold. They'll have what you're looking for

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources