×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Hydrophobic Piping

Hydrophobic Piping

Hydrophobic Piping

(OP)
Does anybody have experience with pipe having inside coated with hydrophobic material? This videoLink shows flow through untreated, hydrophilic and hydrophobic pipes. It seems using this kind of pipes (inside hydrophobic) reduces pump size and consumed energy. Isn't it?

RE: Hydrophobic Piping

There is a new coating out invented by some people from MIT, the company name is LiquiGlide. They have been running promotional ads in the science newsletters.

http://liquiglide.com/

http://www.fastcoexist.com/1679878/mits-freaky-non...

The material has been proposed for condiments such as ketchup, but I don't think that it has been commercialized yet.

It is probably too expensive for industrial fluids at this stage.

RE: Hydrophobic Piping

Most non-drainage pipes in industrial settings run full, not with a mere trickle of water, and the conditions of the demo make it hard to evaluate pumping losses. It's a slick demo, though, so to speak.

There is a fair amount of global experience with polyolefin pipe of one sort or another, but I haven't noticed enough of a difference vs. other materials to go changing pump sizes.

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Hydrophobic Piping

(OP)
Thanks a lot for your reply. Even if in the future a cost effective material can be available, theoretical aspect of formalizing flow through these pipes shall be developed. Here,Link I've found some papers in this regard.

RE: Hydrophobic Piping

Epoxy internal coating for steel pipe reduces roughness and head loss to a noticeable level. Pays for itself in a few years.

RE: Hydrophobic Piping

Wouldnt a teflon (PTFE) coated pipe fit this description?

RE: Hydrophobic Piping

(OP)
To georgeverghes, I think so.

RE: Hydrophobic Piping

Teflon has been around for fifty years. The problems with entering the piping market entry include poor physical properties, durability, ease of use, and cost-effectiveness.

There are many competing technologies undergoing research.

Multiple patents have been issued for various technologies:
http://techportal.eere.energy.gov/technology.do/te...
http://www.ornl.gov/File%20Library/Main%20Nav/ORNL...

LiquiGlide showed three slippery surfaces: teflon, superhydrophic surface and oil. They claimed that LiquiGlide is a better alternative than the three because it removes nearly all liquid without interfering with the consistency. First, the porous solid which is on the surface of the product. On the porous solid is the impregnating liquid and the product's liquid would be on the impregnating liquid. The LiquidGlide coating is like a lubricant in that a permanently wet layer that is designed to be super slippery. Essentially, the end product is resting directly on a layer of liquid.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources