Tensile Testing grips
Tensile Testing grips
(OP)
Grips used in tensile testing can be refurbished and used again. Are there any tensile testers who discard grips and wedges when they gall and the specimen begin to slip?
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS Come Join Us!Are you an
Engineering professional? Join Eng-Tips Forums!
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail. Posting GuidelinesJobs |
|
RE: Tensile Testing grips
We will regrind them to lightly recondition them, but not beyond that.
You have to do that before hey get real bad.
Comparing the cost of grips with the value of lab time it is not a contest, throw them out.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, Plymouth Tube
RE: Tensile Testing grips
I agree with EdStainless. You need to consider the cost of replacing grips against the true value of the data you are producing. Grips are cheap compared to the costs of preparing test specimens, setting up and calibrating the test equipment, compiling the test data, and preparing a test report. This material test data is typically used as the basis for structural analysis, and if it were determined later on that the material testing process was potentially flawed due to use of damaged test equipment, it would create a huge problem for the company.
RE: Tensile Testing grips
RE: Tensile Testing grips
Assuming you are using conventional wedge grips it is customary to lubricate the sliding faces with a Moly type grease to prevent this type of wear.
If you do have damage to the back of the insert then re-grinding to eliminate high spots should be easy.
If the body is worn then you could re-machine and fit a hardened wear plate.
If the grip face is worn then you may be able to repair grips for flat test pieces depending on the size range compared the thickness of the test piece.
If you test piece is round and the Vee is worn they are most likely scrap.
having said all of that it all depends on the capacity of the grips. If they are relatively low capacity then it may not be worthwhile but if they are 100 Tonne + then it will almost certainly worth the repair.
If the machine is old then large capacity grip bodies will almost certainly be cast iron and inserts may be case hardened.
Very old design two-space machines often have the grip face integrated into the crosshead and if you have damaged the slides in this type of machine you could have a serious problem.
It would be good to know the capacity of the machine and the type of grip.
RE: Tensile Testing grips
"Even,if you are a minority of one, truth is the truth."
Mahatma Gandhi.
RE: Tensile Testing grips
The fact is that in the testing labs generally do not use Moly type grease. Perhaps it is not specified by ASTM.
The damage is generally on the surface that grips the specimen. The serrations get damaged, if not by galling perhaps by some other wear mechanism. The FACT is these serrations do wear over time. Generally they are not machined as suggested or fitted with a hardened plate.
The repair of the worn surface is by refurbishing, a process that nearly restores the serrations on the gripping surface.
All sizes of the grips/ wedges have been refurbished/ repaired.
Even the V grips/ wedges have been refurbished or "repaired" and not scrapped.
The grips/ wedges used at 100+ ton testing machines are good candidates.
For old machines the the replacement grips/ wedges are generally not available ex-stock but have to be custom made. These are expensive and it is cheaper to refurbish/ repair the worn grips/ wedges
RE: Tensile Testing grips
RE: Tensile Testing grips
RE: Tensile Testing grips
RE: Tensile Testing grips
RE: Tensile Testing grips
Ideal would be a coefficient of 'zero' and the relationship between wedge angle and clamping force would correlate perfectly.
Th greater the friction the 'worse' the load transfer into the test piece and if the coefficient of friction was to become 1 then no grip action would occur.
All very straightforward.
Ramkiyengar, you limited knowledge has clearly led you to an incorrect set of conclusions.
The wedge insert must slide in the body of the grips to generate the clamping of the test piece. This sliding as no impact on the force required to elongate the test piece and hence no impact on results. I believe Newton's Third Law adequately covers this concept. Any article which states a wedge must not slide is just plain wrong.
In my first job I used to carry out 60-70 tensile tests per day in a 600kN machine equipped with wedge grips and I can promise you that the wedges do slide and they do need lubricating. I had this job for the first 5 years of my career as a metallurgist.
It should be clear, however, that elongation cannot be calculated from crosshead separation on machines equipped with wedge grips although there is a trend in the industry to attempt to make these type of measurement and to claim that they are reasonably accurate and repeatable.
The software used to try to provide this type of data inevitably contains either a Bulgarian Constant or some kind of polynomial 'fudge' to eliminate crosshead and machine deflection but data of this type is at best poor quality and generally uncalibrated.
The only real methodology to produce accurate stress strain curves is to use good quality extensometry and to make direct measurement on the individual test pieces.
Some 'small' capacity test machines do have grips which appear unlubricated, particularly when used to test textiles an other materials that would be contaminated by grease.
Grips for this type f machine are commonly parallel action and can be operated pneumatically or hydraulically.
When wedge grips are used on this type f machine it is common practice to apply a phosphate coating to provide some boundary lubrication and still allow the insert to slide.
To manufacture inserts from materials that are notch-sensitive or have low KIC properties is not sensible even if they have good wear resistance.
Moly grease is well known for its ability to eliminate galling and other problems due to adhesive wear. Both Kluber and Liqui-Moly manufacture a range of suitable products. It is a standard treatment to eliminate fretting fatigue and fretting corrosion damage and I am very surprised you have not encountered these tyoe of greases in terms of the avoidance of wear.
The research carried into gripping out by my former company and by the Testing Machine industry in general is enormous but little if any data is publishes as it is always a commercially sensitive activity.
RE: Tensile Testing grips
I hope the image from WIKIPEDIA tensile testing is uploaded. If not one can go to this reference and look at Various shoulder styles for tensile specimens. Keys A through C are for round specimens, whereas keys D and E are for flat specimens. Key:
I am referring to the B and D which show A round shoulder for use with serrated grips and A flat shoulder for use with serrated grips.
One can see the wedge like components which are serrated. These serrated surfaces are in contact with the specimens used in steel and superalloys testing laboratories and hold the specimen TIGHTLY. They are not lubricated. In my younger days when I did some South Asian style wresting, we would put oil on our bodies to prevent the opponent from "GRIPPING" us. It is also a common experience that it is difficult to grip with a greasy hands. So why would a serrated surface for gripping specimens be greased?
I do agree that if these wedges have to move horizontally (in the figure) then the "sliding" surfaces of the wedges can be greased for smooth sliding and proper grip.
I am under the impression that with OUR limited knowledge we are talking about different issues. PEACE to all and GOODWILL towards humans!
RE: Tensile Testing grips
Your use of the term 'gall' indicates that adhesive wear was taking place and this is typical of the damage that occurs in wedge grips when the grip body to insert interface in not adequately lubricated.
If you are damaging to grip serrations during testing then it is most likely that you are not adequately gripping the test piece which if it is a superalloy could be very hard.
If you are chipping the teeth or the alloy your are gripping is so hard you are flattening the teeth then you should consider changing your gripping strategy.
If I were testing hard round steel bars with prepared test pieces I would consider using a specimen holder with split collets and manufacture button headed test pieces. You should be able to find this type of holder with a self aligning feature and a wedge adapter - the daylight available on your test machine could be an issue.
If you are testing flat material than maybe you need to consider parallel acting hydraulic grips and a regulated hydraulic supply to provide greater gripping capability.
When testing very strong, relatively hard materials there are no shortcuts it is just difficult.
Depending on the number of daily tests there is a compromise between the cost of specimen preparation and the capital cost of the test equipment needed.