INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Jobs

Wear in work holding tools

Wear in work holding tools

(OP)
Fretting is a wear phenomena when two steel parts for example a holder and spindle mouth, rub against one another. Fretting is caused by imperfect mating between
toolholder taper and spindle, creating vibration and heat which develops the fretting. A cermet coating of tungsten carbide can reduce fretting. I would like to know how others have reduced fretting in work holders.

RE: Wear in work holding tools

My experience has been that most fretting is caused by cutting forces being applied to the tool, and thus the toolholder, are inducing elastic stretch into the retention mechanism, be it a stud or drawbar. The coating of a toolholder will not cure this particular issue. I have seen far less fretting on older manual machines in which the drawbar must be tightened manually into the threaded body of the holder than on toolchanger machines which rely on a pull stud. Having said that, I would much rather wear out the toolholder than the spindle receptacle, so any anti-wear treatment would be better suited to the spindle versus the toolholders.

Modern CNC machines with toolchangers have their drawbar tension checked during a proper calibration cycle, but I've still worn out many toolholders over the years. I remember running an old Cincinatti Simplex horizontal boring mill many, many years ago, with 50 taper spindle and about 25 or 30 HP and a manually tightened drawbar to retain the toolholder. I could remove over 300 cubic inches of HY100 in 20 minutes during a roughing pass with no ill effect after dozens of such passes. I highly doubt the same could be accomplished on a CNC center. I still had to rotate 9 inserts on the shell mill and shovel chips after each pass, but the toolholder held up fine.

It is better to have enough ideas for some of them to be wrong, than to be always right by having no ideas at all.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close