×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Is 100% bearing contact always required?

Is 100% bearing contact always required?

Is 100% bearing contact always required?

(OP)
In checking P/A +/- M/S for eccentric loading on a rectangular footing: is it left up to engineering judgment and a client decision to determine if slightly less than 100% bearing contact pressure is acceptable, OR is this never acceptable? This is in regards to a 30' tall vertical vessel on a 9'x9' footing that has 80% bearing contact when it has worst-case horizontal wind loads. But the footing would have to be increased up to like a 14x14' footing to get 100% bearing contact with these wind loads. (As these calculations assume, overburden and concrete weight are disregarded. But when those are factored in, the overturning stability is more than sufficient. So my scenario is that the vessel is safe against falling over, but my question is in regards to the soil bearing contact pressures.) I'll be having the standard design review on this by another engineer, but I wanted to get some input from engineers on this board. Thank you.

RE: Is 100% bearing contact always required?

More often than not, I do utilize less than 100% bearing contact pressure. In many cases, it will lead to a substantially more efficient design as you are finding. If you're going to use a partial contact model, all of the the affected parts and pieces of your structure will also need to be designed for that set of forces but that usually isn't a big deal.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Is 100% bearing contact always required?

I agree with KootK. Full bearing is not required. Just far more likely to overstress the soil due to the increased leverage.

Mike McCann, PE, SE (WA)


RE: Is 100% bearing contact always required?

Full bearing is not required and often not achieved. Further, unless the client is a qualified geotechnical and/or structural engineer, it should not be his/her decision. It is what it is...from an engineering perspective.

RE: Is 100% bearing contact always required?

Ditto what the others say. In bridge design, foundation "rocking" is acceptable in some circumstances for seismic loading. As Mike pointed out keep an eye on the soil pressure.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources