×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Frame vs fixed end beam

Frame vs fixed end beam

Frame vs fixed end beam

(OP)
So I am checking a beam part of a two story, single bay frame, and the moment i am getting from the frame analysis is almost opposite as that of a fixed beam. Fixed beam, I am using WL2/12 at ends, and WL2/24 at center. From the frame analysis I am almost opposite that. Has anyone ever encountered that before?

RE: Frame vs fixed end beam

Fixed ends are infinitely rigid, attracting a lot more moment. The ends of the beam have zero rotation.

Ends of a beam in a frame are attached to columns that have some amount of flexibility - thus there is rotation at the ends of the beam and this dumps more moment into the center of the beam span.

Check out Eng-Tips Forum's Policies here:
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Frame vs fixed end beam

(OP)
Thanks for the quick reply. In my case I am getting almost the opposite, WL2/12 in the center, WL2/24 at the ends. Perhaps its a fluke, but want to make sure.

I would have thought it would be a good gut check to just run a beam from a frame setup as a fixed end, and see if they were close.

im gonna check it with another program to see if I get similar reuslts.

RE: Frame vs fixed end beam

JAE is correct, and your analysis is probably more correct than your intuition.

End Moments:

Zero rigidity (flexure) column: 0
Perfectly rigid column: WL2/12

So your end moment should fall between 0 and WL2/12, such as WL2/24, depending on the flexural rigidity of your column.

RE: Frame vs fixed end beam

An experiment to conduct with your analysis. Change the size of your columns. Instead of what they are now (I'll assume 18" squares), replace them with 48" square columns..... Something way, way stiffer than what you've got now. See how the results move much closer to your perfectly fixed assumption?

Then replace them with really weak columns... Like 6" square columns. See how the moment at the mid-span of your beam moves much closer to WL^2/8?

That should give you a better feel for why the results are the way they are and how sensitive they are to the column size. There is no such thing, of course, as a perfectly pinned or perfectly fixed condition. This experiment just demonstrates it in a way that may be easier to grasp.

RE: Frame vs fixed end beam

(OP)
@ Joshplum, I did what you suggested, and got the results i expected. Thanks for everyones input

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources