Smart questions
Smart answers
Smart people
Join Eng-Tips Forums
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Member Login




Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Join Us!

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips now!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

Join Eng-Tips
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.
Jobs from Indeed

Link To This Forum!

Partner Button
Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum.
Just copy and paste the
code below into your site.

drewtheengineer (Structural) (OP)
13 Dec 02 14:43
A steel column was installed out of plumb (1-1/2" in 8'-6").  I know this is out of the L/500 allowable.  Does anyone see a problem with analyzing the column as is (in other words checking the increased load due to the angle, shear through the connections at the top and bottom of the column and additional load through floor diaghram above).  Is there any code or standard shooting this method down?

Thanks,
Drew
austim (Structural)
13 Dec 02 18:41
I would encourage you to just go ahead and reanalyze the column as it has been built.  If you want to be slightly conservative, add the 1/500 tolerance to the measured inclination in your design model.

Surely there can be no regulation that prohibits non-vertical members?  eg, you can find fancy architected bridges with inclined piers in many locations.

I would take the tolerance on verticality to apply only to members that have been assumed to be truly vertical for the purpose of analysis and design.
jheidt2543 (Civil/Environmental)
14 Dec 02 23:31
I agree with Austim's response, but I am curious - why not straighten the column?  Shore the beam on both sides, cut the connection, straighten the column to vertical and reconnect it.  Problem solved! I shouldn't take but have a day.
drewtheengineer (Structural) (OP)
16 Dec 02 8:15
Thanks guys.

Jheidt2543, that's what I would do, however, the steel column is actually a fix to an existing concrete column that was originally installed out of plumb.  The steel wraps around the concrete.  The owner does not want to shell out that kind of money.

Thanks again for the help.

Drew
BPike (Structural)
16 Dec 02 15:15
Don't forget to account for the horizontal loads that are generated by the column being out of plumb - these may be significant.
drewtheengineer (Structural) (OP)
16 Dec 02 15:20
BPike,
Yeah, the axial load was insignificant.  The horizontal load was my concern but did not amount to very much after all.  Thanks.
FinnB (Structural)
16 Dec 02 16:43
The way I would look at an out of plumb column is as a truly vertical column with the axial load applied at an eccentricity equal to the distance the column is out of plumb.This gives an axial load and an applied moment due to eccentricity.  Design for axial and moment and you are OK. The connection between the concrete and steel coumn also has to be designed to take account of moment.
BantrelStructural (Structural)
7 Jan 03 19:54
It would actually depend on whether the lateral load restraint system was a moment frame, (particularly if this column was a participating element), or some other system like shear walls or bracing. If for example the column was part of a line of columns that were braced, and ignoring beam connection eccentricity, then this column would be acting  simply as a compression strut, and any lateral forces generated as a result of the incline would be handled by the bracing. On the other hand if this column were part of a moment frame bent, then the out-of-plumb could cause P-delta affects on the column, possibly increasing moments (it could also reduce them depending on which direction the principle sidesway moments are occuring on the column).

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!

Back To Forum

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close