×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

ACI column buckling

ACI column buckling

ACI column buckling

(OP)
Dear all, Please help me understand why the Mns (Moment due to slenderness of a non-sway column) is dependent on end moments of columns. Small delta ns is multiplied by larger end moments.

I believe that this should be a function of the eulers buckling load. However, as the equation ACI have it, having no end moments results into zero Mns.

Lets say I have a axially loaded column with zero moment at both ends (due to bracing), with a very high slenderness ratio, then it would be logical that there would be moment at midspan due to the buckling of the column. but under this situation the ACI equation will yield zero moment which is false.

RE: ACI column buckling

This can be a confusing issue when switching between steel and concrete design. Much steel column design is still done using the bifurcation model (Euler). Concrete column design is done using the instability / moment magnification model which many find to be more rational. But then, what is your buckling load when there is no moment? Here's my understanding:

1) Firstly, most codes specify a minimum load eccentricity, either directly or indirectly. That eccentricity results in moments which serve as your buckling perturbations.

2) Most CIP columns carry moments as a result of the marvelous continuity inherent in CIP construction. If your analysis shows no moment on a CIP column, it might be worth reconsidering your analysis. Mid-height bracing will result in small moments, but not necessarily zero moments.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: ACI column buckling

If end moments are small then minimum design moment M2 = M2.min = Pu(0.6+0.03h) (ACI 318R-14 eq. 6.6.4.5.4)

More information provided in commentaries R6.6.4.5.4
ACI 318-11 shall have similar provisions.

Hope it helps!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources